GeForce 6200A vs GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce 6200A
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 251500% higher G3D Mark score and 4700% more VRAM (6 GB vs 128 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 6200A.
| Insight | GeForce 6200A | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-251500%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+251500%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+4700%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 1060 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 6200A and GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce 6200A
The GeForce 6200A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce 6200A scores 4 versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 10,064 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 251500%. The GeForce 6200A is built on Maxwell while the GeForce GTX 1060 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 6200A) vs 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060). Raw compute: 0.7227 TFLOPS (GeForce 6200A) vs 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060). Boost clocks: 941 MHz vs 1733 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 6200A | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4 | 10,064+251500% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 2560+567% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7227 TFLOPS | 8.873 TFLOPS+1128% |
| Boost Clock | 941 MHz | 1733 MHz+84% |
| ROPs | 8 | 64+700% |
| TMUs | 24 | 160+567% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 960 KB+400% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 6200A | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 6200A comes with 128 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 4700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 6200A) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 6200A | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 6 GB+4700% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 192 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce 6200A) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1060). Vulkan: None vs 1.3. OpenGL: 2.1 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce 6200A | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0c | 12+33% |
| Vulkan | None | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.5+114% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 6200A) vs NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060). Decoder: PureVideo vs NVDEC (Pascal). Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce 6200A) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060).
| Feature | GeForce 6200A | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | NVENC (Pascal) |
| Decoder | PureVideo | NVDEC (Pascal) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 6200A draws 33W versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 180W — a 138% difference. The GeForce 6200A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 6200A) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 1060). Power connectors: Legacy vs 6-pin. Card length: 168mm vs 173mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce 6200A | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-82% | 180W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-13% | 400W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | 6-pin |
| Length | 168mm | 173mm |
| Height | 100mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.1 | 55.9+55800% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 6200A launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 and now averages $60. The GeForce 6200A costs 100+% less ($60 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (GeForce 6200A) vs 167.7 (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce 6200A offers Infinity% better value. The GeForce GTX 1060 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce 6200A | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $249 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $60 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 167.7 |
| Codename | GM108 | GP104 |
| Release | March 13 2015 | May 27 2016 |
| Ranking | #810 | #137 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 6200A and GeForce GTX 1060
