GeForce 6200A vs Radeon IGP 340M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon IGP 340M

#398

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

147730%

#413

GRID RTX6000-2Q

MSRP: $6300|Avg: $1500

100%

#414

Radeon IGP 340M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#416

GRID M60-0B

MSRP: $19900|Avg: $19900

90%

#417

Quadro FX 4500 X2

MSRP: $2799|Avg: $2799

80%

#418

Quadro FX 5500

MSRP: $2999|Avg: $30

80%

#419

Quadro FX 1000

MSRP: $500|Avg: $30

70%

#420

Quadro FX 3400/4400

MSRP: $1799|Avg: $50

60%

#421

Quadro FX 1300

MSRP: $599|Avg: $15

60%

#422

Quadro FX 4000

MSRP: $2199|Avg: $50

50%

#423

RADEON IGP 320

MSRP: $100|Avg: $20

40%

#424

Quadro FX 500/FX 600

MSRP: $449|Avg: $15

20%

#425

Quadro FX 2000

MSRP: $3000|Avg: $40

10%

#426

GRID V100-8Q

MSRP: $10000|Avg: $10000

0%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon IGP 340M uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon IGP 340M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce 6200A lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce 6200A is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 33.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon IGP 340M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	GeForce 6200A	Radeon IGP 340M
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+33.3%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-33.3%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 5.0 (2017−2020))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+300%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce 6200A remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce 6200A Benchmark Check

Radeon IGP 340M Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 6200A and Radeon IGP 340M

GeForce 6200A

The GeForce 6200A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

Radeon IGP 340M

The Radeon IGP 340M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 26 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 852 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce 6200A scores 4 versus the Radeon IGP 340M's 3 — the GeForce 6200A leads by 33.3%. The GeForce 6200A is built on Maxwell while the Radeon IGP 340M uses GCN 5.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 6200A) vs 3,584 (Radeon IGP 340M). Raw compute: 0.7227 TFLOPS (GeForce 6200A) vs 10.75 TFLOPS (Radeon IGP 340M). Boost clocks: 941 MHz vs 1500 MHz.

Feature	GeForce 6200A	Radeon IGP 340M
G3D Mark Score	4+33%	3
Architecture	Maxwell	GCN 5.0
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	384	3584+833%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7227 TFLOPS	10.75 TFLOPS+1387%
Boost Clock	941 MHz	1500 MHz+59%
ROPs	8	64+700%
TMUs	24	224+833%
L1 Cache	192 KB	896 KB+367%
L2 Cache	1 MB	4 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce 6200A	Radeon IGP 340M
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 6200A comes with 128 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon IGP 340M has 512 MB. The Radeon IGP 340M offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 6200A) vs 4 MB (Radeon IGP 340M) — the Radeon IGP 340M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 6200A	Radeon IGP 340M
VRAM Capacity	0.125 GB	0.5 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	4 MB+300%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 6200A draws 33W versus the Radeon IGP 340M's 230W — a 149.8% difference. The GeForce 6200A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 6200A) vs 350W (Radeon IGP 340M). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.