GeForce 6200A vs Radeon IGP 340M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 6200A vs Radeon IGP 340M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 6200A vs Radeon IGP 340M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 6200A

2015

Why buy it

✅+33.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Draws 33W instead of 230W, a 197W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon IGP 340M

2018

Why buy it

✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 128 MB).
✅GeForce 6200A is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon IGP 340M is the less risky modern option long term.
✅More future proof: GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3 vs 4).
❌2018 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌597% higher power demand at 230W vs 33W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce 6200A is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 33.3% in PassMark G3D (4 vs 3), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon IGP 340M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs 128 MB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 14nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2018 generation instead of 2015. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce 6200A makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce 6200A is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon IGP 340M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce 6200A vs Radeon IGP 340M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 6200A

The GeForce 6200A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

Radeon IGP 340M

The Radeon IGP 340M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 26 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 852 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce 6200A scores 4 versus the Radeon IGP 340M's 3 — the GeForce 6200A leads by 33.3%. The GeForce 6200A is built on Maxwell while the Radeon IGP 340M uses GCN 5.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 6200A) vs 3,584 (Radeon IGP 340M). Raw compute: 0.7227 TFLOPS (GeForce 6200A) vs 10.75 TFLOPS (Radeon IGP 340M). Boost clocks: 941 MHz vs 1500 MHz.

Feature	GeForce 6200A	Radeon IGP 340M
G3D Mark Score	4+33%	3
Architecture	Maxwell	GCN 5.0
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	384	3584+833%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7227 TFLOPS	10.75 TFLOPS+1387%
Boost Clock	941 MHz	1500 MHz+59%
ROPs	8	64+700%
TMUs	24	224+833%
L1 Cache	192 KB	896 KB+367%
L2 Cache	1 MB	4 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 6200A gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon IGP 340M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce 6200A	Radeon IGP 340M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 6200A has 128 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon IGP 340M carries 512 MB. Radeon IGP 340M gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 6200A and 64-bit on the Radeon IGP 340M. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 6200A) vs 4 MB (Radeon IGP 340M) — the Radeon IGP 340M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 6200A	Radeon IGP 340M
VRAM Capacity	0.125 GB	0.5 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	4 MB+300%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 6200A draws 33W versus the Radeon IGP 340M's 230W — a 149.8% difference. The GeForce 6200A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 6200A) vs 350W (Radeon IGP 340M). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce 6200A	Radeon IGP 340M
TDP	33W-86%	230W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	PCIe-powered
Length	168mm	—
Height	100mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	65°C	—
Perf/Watt	0.1	0.0

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon IGP 340M (2018 vs 2015).

Feature	GeForce 6200A	Radeon IGP 340M
MSRP	$0	—
Codename	GM108	Vega 10
Release	March 13 2015	August 26 2018
Ranking	#810	#593

Search GeForce 6200A on Amazon

Search Radeon IGP 340M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.