GeForce 920MX
VS
GeForce GTX 1060

GeForce 920MX vs GeForce GTX 1060

NVIDIA

GeForce 920MX

2016Core: 965 MHzBoost: 993 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

2016Core: 1607 MHzBoost: 1733 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce 920MX is positioned at rank #360 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 920MX

#350
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
1020%
#352
925%
#353
923%
#357
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
839%
#358
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
833%
#360
GeForce 920MX
MSRP: $100|Avg: $54
100%
#361
100%
#362
Radeon HD 7670A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $40
99%
#363
Radeon Vega 8
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
98%
#367
GeForce 615
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
95%
#369
Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
94%
#370
GeForce GT 730A
MSRP: $75|Avg: $20
93%
#372
Radeon HD 7660G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
90%
#373
Radeon R7 M270DX
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
90%
#374
Radeon HD 6670/7670
MSRP: $99|Avg: $40
90%
#375
Radeon 620
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 845.9% higher G3D Mark score and 1100% more VRAM (6 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 920MX.

InsightGeForce 920MXGeForce GTX 1060
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-845.9%)
Leading raw performance (+845.9%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+1100%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 1060 holds the technical lead. Priced at $54 (vs $60), it costs 10% less, resulting in a 751.3% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGeForce 920MXGeForce GTX 1060
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+751.3%)
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($54)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($60)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 920MX and GeForce GTX 1060

NVIDIA

GeForce 920MX

The GeForce 920MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 25 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 965 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 16W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,064 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce 920MX scores 1,064 versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 10,064 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 845.9%. The GeForce 920MX is built on Maxwell while the GeForce GTX 1060 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 256 (GeForce 920MX) vs 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060). Raw compute: 0.5084 TFLOPS (GeForce 920MX) vs 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060). Boost clocks: 993 MHz vs 1733 MHz.

FeatureGeForce 920MXGeForce GTX 1060
G3D Mark Score
1,064
10,064+846%
Architecture
Maxwell
Pascal
Process Node
28 nm
16 nm
Shading Units
256
2560+900%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.5084 TFLOPS
8.873 TFLOPS+1645%
Boost Clock
993 MHz
1733 MHz+75%
ROPs
8
64+700%
TMUs
24
160+567%
L1 Cache
128 KB
960 KB+650%
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce 920MXGeForce GTX 1060
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 920MX comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 1100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 920MX) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce 920MXGeForce GTX 1060
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
6 GB+1100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
192 GB/s
Bus Width
128-bit
192-bit+50%
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce 920MX) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1060). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce 920MXGeForce GTX 1060
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12
Vulkan
1.1
1.3+18%
OpenGL
4.6+2%
4.5
Max Displays
0
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 920MX) vs NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs NVDEC (Pascal). Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce 920MX) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060).

FeatureGeForce 920MXGeForce GTX 1060
Encoder
None
NVENC (Pascal)
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP6
NVDEC (Pascal)
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,H.265/HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 920MX draws 16W versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 180W — a 167.3% difference. The GeForce 920MX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 920MX) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 1060). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin.

FeatureGeForce 920MXGeForce GTX 1060
TDP
16W-91%
180W
Recommended PSU
350W-13%
400W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
6-pin
Length
173mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
Perf/Watt
66.5+19%
55.9
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce 920MX launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $54, while the GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 and now averages $60. The GeForce 920MX costs 10% less ($6 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 19.7 (GeForce 920MX) vs 167.7 (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 751.3% better value.

FeatureGeForce 920MXGeForce GTX 1060
MSRP
$100-60%
$249
Avg Price (30d)
$54-10%
$60
Performance per Dollar
19.7
167.7+751%
Codename
GM108
GP104
Release
March 25 2016
May 27 2016
Ranking
#864
#137