GeForce FX 5950 Ultra vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

NVIDIA

GeForce FX 5950 Ultra

2011Core: 900 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024Core: 1042 MHzBoost: 1470 MHz
RTX family
·······

GeForce FX 5950 Ultra vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce FX 5950 Ultra vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce FX 5950 Ultra vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce FX 5950 Ultra

2011

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
  • 2011 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $169 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Why buy it

  • 8724.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
  • 2300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 256 MB).
  • Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 8724.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 18118.6% in PassMark G3D (10,749 vs 59), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 6 GB vs 256 MB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 8nm process instead of 40nm, and 18 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce FX 5950 Ultra vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce FX 5950 Ultra

The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 15 2011. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 116W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 59 points. Launch price was $149.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra scores 59 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 10,749 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 18118.6%. The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra is built on Rankine while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB uses Ampere, both on 40 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 192 (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra) vs 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra) vs 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB).

FeatureGeForce FX 5950 UltraGeForce RTX 3050 6GB
G3D Mark Score
59
10,749+18119%
Architecture
Rankine
Ampere
Process Node
40 nm
8 nm
Shading Units
192
2304+1100%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6912 TFLOPS
6.774 TFLOPS+880%
ROPs
24
32+33%
TMUs
32
72+125%
L1 Cache
0.25 MB
2.3 MB+820%
L2 Cache
0.38 MB
2 MB+426%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra is capped at Upscaling support.

FeatureGeForce FX 5950 UltraGeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra has 256 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB carries 6 GB. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives you 2300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra and 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB. L2 Cache: 0.38 MB (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce FX 5950 UltraGeForce RTX 3050 6GB
VRAM Capacity
0.25 GB
6 GB+2300%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
168 GB/s
Bus Width
128-bit+33%
96-bit
L2 Cache
0.38 MB
2 MB+426%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). OpenGL: 1.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce FX 5950 UltraGeForce RTX 3050 6GB
DirectX
9.0a
12 Ultimate+33%
OpenGL
1.5
4.6+207%
Max Displays
2
4+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra draws 116W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 70W — a 49.5% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra) vs 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Power connectors: Legacy vs None. Card length: 229mm vs 160mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.

FeatureGeForce FX 5950 UltraGeForce RTX 3050 6GB
TDP
116W
70W-40%
Recommended PSU
350W
300W-14%
Power Connector
Legacy
None
Length
229mm
160mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
75°C
75°C
Perf/Watt
0.5
153.6+30620%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra came in at $0, while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169. On MSRP, GeForce FX 5950 Ultra was 100+% cheaper ($169 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra) vs 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB (2024 vs 2011).

FeatureGeForce FX 5950 UltraGeForce RTX 3050 6GB
MSRP
$0-100%
$169
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
63.6
Codename
GF116
GA107
Release
March 15 2011
February 2 2024
Ranking
#761
#252

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.