GeForce FX 5950 Ultra vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce FX 5950 Ultra vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce FX 5950 Ultra vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce FX 5950 Ultra

2011

Why buy it

✅Draws 116W instead of 160W, a 44W reduction.
✅Measures 229mm instead of 240mm, a 11mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌2011 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Why buy it

✅18480.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅3100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 256 MB).
✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌37.9% higher power demand at 160W vs 116W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 18480.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 38291.5% in PassMark G3D (22,651 vs 59), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 256 MB of VRAM, the newer feature stack, with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023), while GeForce FX 5950 Ultra is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 5nm process instead of 40nm, and 34 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce FX 5950 Ultra vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce FX 5950 Ultra

The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 15 2011. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 116W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 59 points. Launch price was $149.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra scores 59 versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti's 22,651 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 38291.5%. The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra is built on Rankine while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 40 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 192 (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra) vs 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra) vs 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti).

Feature	GeForce FX 5950 Ultra	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
G3D Mark Score	59	22,651+38292%
Architecture	Rankine	Ada Lovelace
Process Node	40 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	192	4352+2167%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6912 TFLOPS	22.06 TFLOPS+3092%
ROPs	24	48+100%
TMUs	32	136+325%
L1 Cache	0.25 MB	4.3 MB+1620%
L2 Cache	0.38 MB	32 MB+8321%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra is capped at Upscaling support.

Feature	GeForce FX 5950 Ultra	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	No	Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra has 256 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti carries 8 GB. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives you 3100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra and 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti. L2 Cache: 0.38 MB (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra) vs 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce FX 5950 Ultra	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB	8 GB+3100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	288 GB/s
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	0.38 MB	32 MB+8321%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). OpenGL: 1.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce FX 5950 Ultra	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
DirectX	9.0a	12.2+36%
OpenGL	1.5	4.6+207%
Max Displays	2	4+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra draws 116W versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti's 160W — a 31.9% difference. The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Power connectors: Legacy vs 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70°C.

Feature	GeForce FX 5950 Ultra	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
TDP	116W-28%	160W
Recommended PSU	350W-36%	550W
Power Connector	Legacy	8-pin
Length	229mm	240mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	75°C	70°C-7%
Perf/Watt	0.5	141.6+28220%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra came in at $0, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399. On MSRP, GeForce FX 5950 Ultra was 100+% cheaper ($399 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra) vs 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (2023 vs 2011).

Feature	GeForce FX 5950 Ultra	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
MSRP	$0-100%	$399
Performance per Dollar	Infinity	56.8
Codename	GF116	AD106
Release	March 15 2011	May 18 2023
Ranking	#761	#59

Search GeForce FX 5950 Ultra on Amazon

Search GeForce RTX 4060 Ti on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.