GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
GeForce GTX 1650
GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 vs GeForce GTX 1650 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 vs GeForce GTX 1650: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
2011Why buy it
- ✅Costs $20 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ✅Measures 210mm instead of 229mm, a 19mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 25.8 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌41.3% higher power demand at 106W vs 75W.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Why buy it
- ✅278.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 104.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 25.8 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1650 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 106W, a 31W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 15 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 783 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 106W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,331 points.
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 scores 3,331 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 136.2%. The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 40 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 192 (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 0.6013 TFLOPS (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650).
| Feature | GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,331 | 7,869+136% |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 896+367% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6013 TFLOPS | 2.984 TFLOPS+396% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 32 | 56+75% |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 896 KB+250% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 carries 4 GB. GeForce GTX 1650 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 128 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.4+17% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 3+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).
| Feature | GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | NVDEC 4th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 draws 106W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 34.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None. Card length: 210mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 68°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 106W | 75W-29% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W | 300W-25% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Length | 210mm | 229mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 68°C-3% | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 31.4 | 104.9+234% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 came in at $129, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149. On MSRP, GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 was 13.4% cheaper ($20 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 25.8 (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) vs 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 104.7% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1650 (2019 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $129-13% | $149 |
| Performance per Dollar | 25.8 | 52.8+105% |
| Codename | GF116 | TU117 |
| Release | March 15 2011 | April 23 2019 |
| Ranking | #739 | #323 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 and GeForce GTX 1650
