G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 vs GeForce RTX 4060 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 vs GeForce RTX 4060: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2

2011

Why buy it

✅Costs $170 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
✅Measures 210mm instead of 240mm, a 30mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 25.8 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4060

2023

Why buy it

✅708.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 153.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 25.8 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌14.3% longer card at 240mm vs 210mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce RTX 4060 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 708.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 486.9% in PassMark G3D (19,548 vs 3,331), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM, the newer feature stack, with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023), while GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 5nm process instead of 40nm, and 24 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 4060 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $170 more expensive on MSRP at $299 vs $129, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 153.2% (65.4 vs 25.8), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 vs GeForce RTX 4060 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2

The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 15 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 783 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 106W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,331 points.

GeForce RTX 4060

The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 scores 3,331 versus the GeForce RTX 4060's 19,548 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 486.9%. The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 4060 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 40 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 192 (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) vs 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060). Raw compute: 0.6013 TFLOPS (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) vs 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060).

Feature	GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2	GeForce RTX 4060
G3D Mark Score	3,331	19,548+487%
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	Ada Lovelace
Process Node	40 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	192	3072+1500%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6013 TFLOPS	15.11 TFLOPS+2413%
ROPs	16	48+200%
TMUs	32	96+200%
L1 Cache	0.25 MB	3 MB+1100%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	24 MB+9500%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 is capped at Upscaling support.

Feature	GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2	GeForce RTX 4060
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	No	Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4060 carries 8 GB. GeForce RTX 4060 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 and 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4060. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) vs 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2	GeForce RTX 4060
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	8 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	272 GB/s
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	24 MB+9500%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2	GeForce RTX 4060
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 Ultimate
Vulkan	1.2	1.3+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	2	4+100%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) vs NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060).

Feature	GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2	GeForce RTX 4060
Encoder	PureVideo HD VP4	NVENC 8th gen
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP4	NVDEC 5th gen
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 draws 106W versus the GeForce RTX 4060's 115W — a 8.1% difference. The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 210mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 68°C vs 73°C.

Feature	GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2	GeForce RTX 4060
TDP	106W-8%	115W
Recommended PSU	400W-27%	550W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	8-pin
Length	210mm	240mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	68°C-7%	73°C
Perf/Watt	31.4	170.0+441%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 came in at $129, while the GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299. On MSRP, GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 was 56.9% cheaper ($170 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 25.8 (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) vs 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 153.5% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4060 (2023 vs 2011).

Feature	GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2	GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP	$129-57%	$299
Performance per Dollar	25.8	65.4+153%
Codename	GF116	AD107
Release	March 15 2011	May 18 2023
Ranking	#739	#84

Search GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 on Amazon

Search GeForce RTX 4060 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.