GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs GeForce GTX 1650

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2

2013Core: 863 MHzBoost: 902 MHz
Similar parts
·
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz
GTX family
·······

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs GeForce GTX 1650 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs GeForce GTX 1650: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2

2013

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 335.6% HIGHER MSRP
    $649 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.0 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
  • 233.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 75W.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

  • 7.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $500 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
  • Delivers 427.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 10.0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
  • GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so GeForce GTX 1650 is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 75W instead of 250W, a 175W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 1650 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 7.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 21.1% in PassMark G3D (7,869 vs 6,500), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 1650 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1650 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $500 cheaper on MSRP at $149 vs $649, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 427.3% (52.8 vs 10.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2

The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 10 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 863 MHz to 902 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,500 points. Launch price was $649.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 scores 6,500 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 21.1%. The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is built on Kepler while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 4.156 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 902 MHz vs 1665 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2GeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score
6,500
7,869+21%
Architecture
Kepler
Turing
Process Node
28 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
2304+157%
896
Compute (TFLOPS)
4.156 TFLOPS+39%
2.984 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
902 MHz
1665 MHz+85%
ROPs
48+50%
32
TMUs
192+243%
56
L1 Cache
192 KB
896 KB+367%
L2 Cache
1.5 MB+50%
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2GeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) — a 125% advantage for the GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2GeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
288 GB/s+125%
128 GB/s
Bus Width
384-bit+200%
128-bit
L2 Cache
1.5 MB+50%
1 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 draws 250W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 107.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs None.

FeatureGeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2GeForce GTX 1650
TDP
250W
75W-70%
Recommended PSU
600W
300W-50%
Power Connector
6-pin + 8-pin
None
Length
229mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
70°C
Perf/Watt
26.0
104.9+303%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 came in at $649, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 was 77% cheaper ($500 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 10.0 (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 428% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1650 (2019 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2GeForce GTX 1650
MSRP
$649
$149-77%
Performance per Dollar
10.0
52.8+428%
Codename
GK110B
TU117
Release
September 10 2013
April 23 2019
Ranking
#487
#323

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.