
GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2

GeForce GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs GeForce GTX 1650 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs GeForce GTX 1650: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
2013Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌335.6% HIGHER MSRP$649 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.0 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌233.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 75W.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Why buy it
- ✅7.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $500 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 427.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 10.0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- ✅GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so GeForce GTX 1650 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 250W, a 175W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 10 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 863 MHz to 902 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,500 points. Launch price was $649.

GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 scores 6,500 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 21.1%. The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is built on Kepler while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 4.156 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 902 MHz vs 1665 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,500 | 7,869+21% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Turing |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+157% | 896 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.156 TFLOPS+39% | 2.984 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 902 MHz | 1665 MHz+85% |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 192+243% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 896 KB+367% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+50% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) — a 125% advantage for the GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s+125% | 128 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+200% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+50% | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 draws 250W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 107.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs None.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 75W-70% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 300W-50% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | None |
| Length | — | 229mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 26.0 | 104.9+303% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 came in at $649, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 was 77% cheaper ($500 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 10.0 (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 428% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1650 (2019 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $649 | $149-77% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.0 | 52.8+428% |
| Codename | GK110B | TU117 |
| Release | September 10 2013 | April 23 2019 |
| Ranking | #487 | #323 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














