CPU
GPU
GeForce GTX TITAN X
Popular choices:
Arc A750
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Arc A750
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Arc A750 is significantly newer (2022 vs 2015). The Arc A750 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX TITAN X lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX TITAN X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (12 GB vs 8 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Arc A750.
| Insight | GeForce GTX TITAN X | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) / 6nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+50%) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (268mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX TITAN X offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $120 versus $229 for the Arc A750, it costs 48% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 91.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX TITAN X | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+91.2%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($120) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($229) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX TITAN X and Arc A750
GeForce GTX TITAN X
The GeForce GTX TITAN X is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 17 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1075 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,621 points. Launch price was $999.
Arc A750
The Arc A750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2050 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,600 points. Launch price was $289.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX TITAN X scores 12,621 and the Arc A750 reaches 12,600 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX TITAN X is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Arc A750 uses Generation 12.7, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 3,584 (Arc A750). Raw compute: 6.691 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 17.2 TFLOPS (Arc A750). Boost clocks: 1075 MHz vs 2400 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,621 | 12,600 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Generation 12.7 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072 | 3584+17% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.691 TFLOPS | 17.2 TFLOPS+157% |
| Boost Clock | 1075 MHz | 2400 MHz+123% |
| ROPs | 96 | 112+17% |
| TMUs | 192 | 224+17% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 16 MB+433% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX TITAN X comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Arc A750 has 8 GB. The GeForce GTX TITAN X offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 512 GB/s (Arc A750) — a 52.4% advantage for the Arc A750. Bus width: 384-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 16 MB (Arc A750) — the Arc A750 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+50% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s | 512 GB/s+52% |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+50% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 16 MB+433% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL 12_1) (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 12 Ultimate (Arc A750). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL 12_1) | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 2nd gen (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs Dual Xe Media Engine (Arc A750). Decoder: NVDEC 2nd gen vs Xe Media Engine. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Arc A750).
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 2nd gen | Dual Xe Media Engine |
| Decoder | NVDEC 2nd gen | Xe Media Engine |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX TITAN X draws 250W versus the Arc A750's 225W — a 10.5% difference. The Arc A750 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 650W (Arc A750). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 8-pin + 6-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 268mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 83°C vs 78°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 225W-10% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W-8% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | 8-pin + 6-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 268mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 83°C | 78°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 50.5 | 56.0+11% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX TITAN X launched at $999 MSRP and currently averages $120, while the Arc A750 launched at $289 and now averages $229. The GeForce GTX TITAN X costs 47.6% less ($109 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 105.2 (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 55.0 (Arc A750) — the GeForce GTX TITAN X offers 91.3% better value. The Arc A750 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999 | $289-71% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $120-48% | $229 |
| Performance per Dollar | 105.2+91% | 55.0 |
| Codename | GM200 | DG2-512 |
| Release | March 17 2015 | October 12 2022 |
| Ranking | #209 | #212 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX TITAN X and Arc A750
