
GeForce GTX TITAN X

GeForce RTX 4070
GeForce GTX TITAN X vs GeForce RTX 4070 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX TITAN X vs GeForce RTX 4070 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX TITAN X vs GeForce RTX 4070: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX TITAN X
2015Why buy it
- ✅Measures 267mm instead of 304mm, a 37mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌2015 hardware with 12 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌66.8% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.6 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅68.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $400 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 255.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 12.6 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌13.9% longer card at 304mm vs 267mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX TITAN X vs GeForce RTX 4070 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX TITAN X
The GeForce GTX TITAN X is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 17 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1075 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,621 points. Launch price was $999.

GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX TITAN X scores 12,621 versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 26,919 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 113.3%. The GeForce GTX TITAN X is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 4070 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070). Raw compute: 6.691 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070). Boost clocks: 1075 MHz vs 2475 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,621 | 26,919+113% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072 | 5888+92% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.691 TFLOPS | 29.15 TFLOPS+336% |
| Boost Clock | 1075 MHz | 2475 MHz+130% |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 192+4% | 184 |
| L1 Cache | 1.1 MB | 5.8 MB+427% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 36 MB+1100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce GTX TITAN X does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX TITAN X is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 12 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070) — a 50% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the GeForce GTX TITAN X and 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 4070. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s | 504 GB/s+50% |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+100% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 36 MB+1100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL 12_1) (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL 12_1) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 2nd gen (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070). Decoder: NVDEC 2nd gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070).
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 2nd gen | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 2nd gen | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX TITAN X draws 250W versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 200W — a 22.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 4070). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 304mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 83°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 200W-20% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W-8% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 304mm |
| Height | 111mm | 137mm |
| Slots | 2-33% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 83°C | 80°C-4% |
| Perf/Watt | 50.5 | 134.6+167% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX TITAN X came in at $999, while the GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 4070 was 40% cheaper ($400 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.6 (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 256.3% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4070 (2023 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999 | $599-40% |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.6 | 44.9+256% |
| Codename | GM200 | AD104 |
| Release | March 17 2015 | April 12 2023 |
| Ranking | #209 | #32 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















