GeForce GTX TITAN X
Radeon Pro 5700 XT
GeForce GTX TITAN X vs Radeon Pro 5700 XT Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX TITAN X vs Radeon Pro 5700 XT FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX TITAN X vs Radeon Pro 5700 XT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX TITAN X
2015Why buy it
- ✅6.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2015 hardware with 12 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌99.8% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$500 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.6 vs 24.9 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 130W.
Radeon Pro 5700 XT
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $499 less on MSRP ($500 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 97% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 24.9 vs 12.6 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 12 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 250W, a 120W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX TITAN X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX TITAN X vs Radeon Pro 5700 XT Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce GTX TITAN X
The GeForce GTX TITAN X is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 17 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1075 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,621 points. Launch price was $999.
Radeon Pro 5700 XT
The Radeon Pro 5700 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1499 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,442 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX TITAN X scores 12,621 and the Radeon Pro 5700 XT reaches 12,442 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX TITAN X is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon Pro 5700 XT uses RDNA 1.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 2,560 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Raw compute: 6.691 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 7.675 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Boost clocks: 1075 MHz vs 1499 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,621+1% | 12,442 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+20% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.691 TFLOPS | 7.675 TFLOPS+15% |
| Boost Clock | 1075 MHz | 1499 MHz+39% |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 192+20% | 160 |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX TITAN X gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX TITAN X has 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 5700 XT carries 16 GB. Radeon Pro 5700 XT gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the GeForce GTX TITAN X and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro 5700 XT. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) — the Radeon Pro 5700 XT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 16 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+200% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL 12_1) (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL 12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 2nd gen (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs RDNA 1.0 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Decoder: NVDEC 2nd gen vs Unified Video Decoder 7.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT).
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 2nd gen | RDNA 1.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 2nd gen | Unified Video Decoder 7.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX TITAN X draws 250W versus the Radeon Pro 5700 XT's 130W — a 63.2% difference. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 500W (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 83°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 130W-48% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 500W-17% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 83°C | 75°C-10% |
| Perf/Watt | 50.5 | 95.7+90% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX TITAN X came in at $999, while the Radeon Pro 5700 XT launched at $500. On MSRP, Radeon Pro 5700 XT was 49.9% cheaper ($499 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.6 (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 24.9 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) — the Radeon Pro 5700 XT offers 97.6% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro 5700 XT (2020 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999 | $500-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.6 | 24.9+98% |
| Codename | GM200 | Navi 10 |
| Release | March 17 2015 | August 4 2020 |
| Ranking | #209 | #215 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX TITAN X and Radeon Pro 5700 XT
