
GeForce GTX TITAN X vs Radeon Pro 5700 XT

GeForce GTX TITAN X
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 5700 XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro 5700 XT
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Pro 5700 XT uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX TITAN X lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX TITAN X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon Pro 5700 XT offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GTX TITAN X | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) / 7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX TITAN X offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $120 versus $280 for the Radeon Pro 5700 XT, it costs 57% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 136.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX TITAN X | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+136.7%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($120) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($280) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX TITAN X and Radeon Pro 5700 XT

GeForce GTX TITAN X
The GeForce GTX TITAN X is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 17 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1075 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,621 points. Launch price was $999.

Radeon Pro 5700 XT
The Radeon Pro 5700 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1499 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,442 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX TITAN X scores 12,621 and the Radeon Pro 5700 XT reaches 12,442 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX TITAN X is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon Pro 5700 XT uses RDNA 1.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 2,560 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Raw compute: 6.691 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 7.675 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Boost clocks: 1075 MHz vs 1499 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,621+1% | 12,442 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+20% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.691 TFLOPS | 7.675 TFLOPS+15% |
| Boost Clock | 1075 MHz | 1499 MHz+39% |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 192+20% | 160 |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX TITAN X comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 5700 XT has 16 GB. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 384-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) — the Radeon Pro 5700 XT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 16 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+200% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL 12_1) (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL 12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 2nd gen (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs RDNA 1.0 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Decoder: NVDEC 2nd gen vs Unified Video Decoder 7.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT).
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 2nd gen | RDNA 1.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 2nd gen | Unified Video Decoder 7.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX TITAN X draws 250W versus the Radeon Pro 5700 XT's 130W — a 63.2% difference. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 500W (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 83°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 130W-48% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 500W-17% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 83°C | 75°C-10% |
| Perf/Watt | 50.5 | 95.7+90% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX TITAN X launched at $999 MSRP and currently averages $120, while the Radeon Pro 5700 XT launched at $500 and now averages $280. The GeForce GTX TITAN X costs 57.1% less ($160 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 105.2 (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 44.4 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) — the GeForce GTX TITAN X offers 136.9% better value. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999 | $500-50% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $120-57% | $280 |
| Performance per Dollar | 105.2+137% | 44.4 |
| Codename | GM200 | Navi 10 |
| Release | March 17 2015 | August 4 2020 |
| Ranking | #209 | #215 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















