GRID M10-8Q vs Radeon HD 6850 X2

GRID M10-8Q

2016Core: 1033 MHzBoost: 1306 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 6850 X2

2011Core: 800 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GRID M10-8Q vs Radeon HD 6850 X2 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID M10-8Q vs Radeon HD 6850 X2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID M10-8Q

2016

Why buy it

  • More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 614.3% HIGHER MSRP
    $2,500 MSRPvs$350 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.0 vs 7.2 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).

Radeon HD 6850 X2

2011

Why buy it

  • Costs $2,150 less on MSRP ($350 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
  • Delivers 597.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.2 vs 1.0 G3D/$ ($350 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • 2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GRID M10-8Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.4% in PassMark G3D (2,595 vs 2,534), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GRID M10-8Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2016 generation instead of 2011. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 6850 X2 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,150 cheaper on MSRP at $350 vs $2,500, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 597.5% (7.2 vs 1.0), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 6850 X2 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GRID M10-8Q has the stronger long-term case.

GRID M10-8Q vs Radeon HD 6850 X2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GRID M10-8Q

The GRID M10-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,595 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 6850 X2

The Radeon HD 6850 X2 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 19 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 960 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 254W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,534 points.

Graphics Performance

The GRID M10-8Q scores 2,595 and the Radeon HD 6850 X2 reaches 2,534 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M10-8Q is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 6850 X2 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 640 (GRID M10-8Q) vs 960 (Radeon HD 6850 X2). Raw compute: 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID M10-8Q) vs 1.536 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon HD 6850 X2).

FeatureGRID M10-8QRadeon HD 6850 X2
G3D Mark Score
2,595+2%
2,534
Architecture
Maxwell
TeraScale 2
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
640
960 ×2+50%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.672 TFLOPS+9%
1.536 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs
16
32 ×2+100%
TMUs
40
48 ×2+20%
L1 Cache
320 KB+67%
192 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGRID M10-8QRadeon HD 6850 X2
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID M10-8Q and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6850 X2. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M10-8Q) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 6850 X2) — the GRID M10-8Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGRID M10-8QRadeon HD 6850 X2
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
0.5 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GRID M10-8Q) vs 11.2 (Radeon HD 6850 X2). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.

FeatureGRID M10-8QRadeon HD 6850 X2
DirectX
12 (12_1)+7%
11.2
Max Displays
0
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (4th Gen) (GRID M10-8Q) vs UVD 2.2 (Radeon HD 6850 X2). Decoder: NVDEC (2nd Gen) vs UVD 2.2.

FeatureGRID M10-8QRadeon HD 6850 X2
Encoder
NVENC (4th Gen)
UVD 2.2
Decoder
NVDEC (2nd Gen)
UVD 2.2
Codecs
H.264,H.265
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID M10-8Q draws 225W versus the Radeon HD 6850 X2's 254W — a 12.1% difference. The GRID M10-8Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M10-8Q) vs 600W (Radeon HD 6850 X2). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 285mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

FeatureGRID M10-8QRadeon HD 6850 X2
TDP
225W-11%
254W
Recommended PSU
350W-42%
600W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
2x 8-pin
Length
267mm
285mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
85
Perf/Watt
11.5+15%
10.0
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID M10-8Q came in at $2500, while the Radeon HD 6850 X2 launched at $350. On MSRP, Radeon HD 6850 X2 was 86% cheaper ($2150 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.0 (GRID M10-8Q) vs 7.2 (Radeon HD 6850 X2) — the Radeon HD 6850 X2 offers 620% better value. The newer card here is GRID M10-8Q (2016 vs 2011).

FeatureGRID M10-8QRadeon HD 6850 X2
MSRP
$2500
$350-86%
Performance per Dollar
1.0
7.2+620%
Codename
GM107
Barts
Release
May 18 2016
September 19 2011
Ranking
#622
#630

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.