CPU
GPU
HD Graphics 630
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The HD Graphics 630 is positioned at rank #350 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar HD Graphics 630
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce GTX 1650 uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce GTX 1650 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The HD Graphics 630 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 608.3% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (4 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the HD Graphics 630.
| Insight | HD Graphics 630 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-608.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+608.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $75 (vs $30), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 183.3% better value per dollar than the HD Graphics 630.
| Insight | HD Graphics 630 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+183.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($30) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($75) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of HD Graphics 630 and GeForce GTX 1650
HD Graphics 630
The HD Graphics 630 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 1 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,111 points.
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the HD Graphics 630 scores 1,111 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 608.3%. The HD Graphics 630 is built on Generation 9.5 while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 14 nm++ vs 12 nm. Shader units: 192 (HD Graphics 630) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 0.384 TFLOPS (HD Graphics 630) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 1665 MHz.
| Feature | HD Graphics 630 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,111 | 7,869+608% |
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Turing |
| Process Node | 14 nm++ | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 896+367% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.384 TFLOPS | 2.984 TFLOPS+677% |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | 1665 MHz+67% |
| ROPs | 3 | 32+967% |
| TMUs | 24 | 56+133% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | HD Graphics 630 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The HD Graphics 630 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | HD Graphics 630 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 128 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The HD Graphics 630 draws 15W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 133.3% difference. The HD Graphics 630 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (HD Graphics 630) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: Integrated vs None.
| Feature | HD Graphics 630 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-80% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 300W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | None |
| Length | — | 229mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 74.1 | 104.9+42% |
Value Analysis
The HD Graphics 630 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The HD Graphics 630 costs 60% less ($45 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 37.0 (HD Graphics 630) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 183.5% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2017).
| Feature | HD Graphics 630 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-33% | $149 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30-60% | $75 |
| Performance per Dollar | 37.0 | 104.9+184% |
| Codename | Kaby Lake GT2 | TU117 |
| Release | January 1 2017 | April 23 2019 |
| Ranking | #823 | #323 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on HD Graphics 630 and GeForce GTX 1650
