Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs FireStream 9250
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Popular choices:
FireStream 9250
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is positioned at rank 403 and the FireStream 9250 is on rank 340, so the FireStream 9250 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Performance Per Dollar FireStream 9250
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FireStream 9250 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | FireStream 9250 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Generation 7.5 (2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / TeraScale (2005−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $49), it costs 18% less, resulting in a 23.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | FireStream 9250 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+23.2%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($40) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and FireStream 9250
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 27 2013. It features the Generation 7.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 200 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 22 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,172 points.
FireStream 9250
The FireStream 9250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 16 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,165 points.
Graphics Performance
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 scores 1,172 and the FireStream 9250 reaches 1,165 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is built on Generation 7.5 while the FireStream 9250 uses TeraScale, both on 22 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 320 (Iris Pro Graphics 5200) vs 800 (FireStream 9250). Raw compute: 0.768 TFLOPS (Iris Pro Graphics 5200) vs 1 TFLOPS (FireStream 9250).
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | FireStream 9250 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,172 | 1,165 |
| Architecture | Generation 7.5 | TeraScale |
| Process Node | 22 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 320 | 800+150% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.768 TFLOPS | 1 TFLOPS+30% |
| ROPs | 4 | 16+300% |
| TMUs | 40 | 40 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | FireStream 9250 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the FireStream 9250 has 1 GB. The FireStream 9250 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | FireStream 9250 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 draws 30W versus the FireStream 9250's 150W — a 133.3% difference. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Pro Graphics 5200) vs 350W (FireStream 9250). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | FireStream 9250 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-80% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 234mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | Unknown |
| Perf/Watt | 39.1+401% | 7.8 |
Value Analysis
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the FireStream 9250 launched at $999 and now averages $49. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 costs 18.4% less ($9 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 29.3 (Iris Pro Graphics 5200) vs 23.8 (FireStream 9250) — the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 offers 23.1% better value. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2008).
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | FireStream 9250 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-85% | $999 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40-18% | $49 |
| Performance per Dollar | 29.3+23% | 23.8 |
| Codename | Haswell GT3e | RV770 |
| Release | May 27 2013 | June 16 2008 |
| Ranking | #835 | #840 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and FireStream 9250
