Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is positioned at rank #403 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is significantly newer (2022 vs 2013). The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 914.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (8 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
| Insight | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-914.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+914.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Generation 7.5 (2013)) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $150 (vs $40), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 170.6% better value per dollar than the Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
| Insight | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+170.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($40) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 27 2013. It features the Generation 7.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 200 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 22 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,172 points.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 scores 1,172 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 11,892 — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM leads by 914.7%. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is built on Generation 7.5 while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM uses Ampere, both on 22 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 320 (Iris Pro Graphics 5200) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Raw compute: 0.768 TFLOPS (Iris Pro Graphics 5200) vs 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Boost clocks: 1200 MHz vs 1755 MHz.
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,172 | 11,892+915% |
| Architecture | Generation 7.5 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 22 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 320 | 2560+700% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.768 TFLOPS | 8.986 TFLOPS+1070% |
| Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | 1755 MHz+46% |
| ROPs | 4 | 32+700% |
| TMUs | 40 | 80+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 draws 30W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 130W — a 125% difference. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Pro Graphics 5200) vs 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Power connectors: Integrated vs 8-pin.
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-77% | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 450W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | 8-pin |
| Length | — | 235mm |
| Height | — | 124mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 39.1 | 91.5+134% |
Value Analysis
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 and now averages $150. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 costs 73.3% less ($110 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 29.3 (Iris Pro Graphics 5200) vs 79.3 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 170.6% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2013).
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-40% | $249 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40-73% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 29.3 | 79.3+171% |
| Codename | Haswell GT3e | GA106 |
| Release | May 27 2013 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #835 | #224 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
