Iris Pro Graphics P6300 vs GeForce GTX 555
Iris Pro Graphics P6300
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 555
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 555 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (1 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Pro Graphics P6300.
| Insight | Iris Pro Graphics P6300 | GeForce GTX 555 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Generation 8.0 (2014−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 555 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 555 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $50), it costs 40% less, resulting in a 69% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Iris Pro Graphics P6300 | GeForce GTX 555 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+69%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) | ✅More affordable ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Iris Pro Graphics P6300 and GeForce GTX 555
Iris Pro Graphics P6300
The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2014. It features the Generation 8.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 800 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,582 points.
GeForce GTX 555
The GeForce GTX 555 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 14 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 720 MHz. It has 144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,604 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 scores 1,582 and the GeForce GTX 555 reaches 1,604 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is built on Generation 8.0 while the GeForce GTX 555 uses Fermi 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (Iris Pro Graphics P6300) vs 144 (GeForce GTX 555). Raw compute: 0.6144 TFLOPS (Iris Pro Graphics P6300) vs 0.4147 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 555).
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics P6300 | GeForce GTX 555 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,582 | 1,604+1% |
| Architecture | Generation 8.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+167% | 144 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6144 TFLOPS+48% | 0.4147 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 6 | 16+167% |
| TMUs | 48+100% | 24 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics P6300 | GeForce GTX 555 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 555 has 1 GB. The GeForce GTX 555 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics P6300 | GeForce GTX 555 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_1) (Iris Pro Graphics P6300) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 555). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6.
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics P6300 | GeForce GTX 555 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.2+9% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 draws 15W versus the GeForce GTX 555's 70W — a 129.4% difference. The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Pro Graphics P6300) vs 450W (GeForce GTX 555). Power connectors: Integrated vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics P6300 | GeForce GTX 555 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-79% | 70W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 450W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 210mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 105.5+361% | 22.9 |
Value Analysis
The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the GeForce GTX 555 launched at $150 and now averages $30. The GeForce GTX 555 costs 40% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 31.6 (Iris Pro Graphics P6300) vs 53.5 (GeForce GTX 555) — the GeForce GTX 555 offers 69.3% better value. The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2011).
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics P6300 | GeForce GTX 555 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | $150 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | $30-40% |
| Performance per Dollar | 31.6 | 53.5+69% |
| Codename | Broadwell GT3e | GF116 |
| Release | September 5 2014 | May 14 2011 |
| Ranking | #755 | #849 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Iris Pro Graphics P6300 and GeForce GTX 555
