Iris Pro Graphics P6300 vs Radeon RX 7600
Iris Pro Graphics P6300
Popular choices:
Radeon RX 7600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 7600
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX 7600 is significantly newer (2023 vs 2014). The Radeon RX 7600 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 7600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 948.1% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (8 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Pro Graphics P6300.
| Insight | Iris Pro Graphics P6300 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-948.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+948.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Generation 8.0 (2014−2015)) | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 6nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 7600 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $250 (vs $50), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 109.6% better value per dollar than the Iris Pro Graphics P6300.
| Insight | Iris Pro Graphics P6300 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+109.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($50) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($250) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Iris Pro Graphics P6300 and Radeon RX 7600
Iris Pro Graphics P6300
The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2014. It features the Generation 8.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 800 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,582 points.
Radeon RX 7600
The Radeon RX 7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1720 MHz to 2655 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,581 points. Launch price was $269.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Iris Pro Graphics P6300 scores 1,582 versus the Radeon RX 7600's 16,581 — the Radeon RX 7600 leads by 948.1%. The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is built on Generation 8.0 while the Radeon RX 7600 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 14 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 384 (Iris Pro Graphics P6300) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 7600). Raw compute: 0.6144 TFLOPS (Iris Pro Graphics P6300) vs 21.75 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7600). Boost clocks: 800 MHz vs 2655 MHz.
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics P6300 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,582 | 16,581+948% |
| Architecture | Generation 8.0 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 2048+433% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6144 TFLOPS | 21.75 TFLOPS+3440% |
| Boost Clock | 800 MHz | 2655 MHz+232% |
| ROPs | 6 | 64+967% |
| TMUs | 48 | 128+167% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7600 is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics P6300 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 3 (Native) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7600 has 8 GB. The Radeon RX 7600 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics P6300 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 288 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_1) (Iris Pro Graphics P6300) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 7600). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6.
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics P6300 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 draws 15W versus the Radeon RX 7600's 165W — a 166.7% difference. The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Pro Graphics P6300) vs 550W (Radeon RX 7600). Power connectors: Integrated vs 8-pin. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics P6300 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-91% | 165W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 550W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | 8-pin |
| Length | — | 240mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 105.5+5% | 100.5 |
Value Analysis
The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Radeon RX 7600 launched at $269 and now averages $250. The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 costs 80% less ($200 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 31.6 (Iris Pro Graphics P6300) vs 66.3 (Radeon RX 7600) — the Radeon RX 7600 offers 109.8% better value. The Radeon RX 7600 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2014).
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics P6300 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-44% | $269 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50-80% | $250 |
| Performance per Dollar | 31.6 | 66.3+110% |
| Codename | Broadwell GT3e | Navi 33 |
| Release | September 5 2014 | May 24 2023 |
| Ranking | #755 | #118 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Iris Pro Graphics P6300 and Radeon RX 7600
