P106-100 vs T600

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The P106-100 is positioned at rank 43 and the T600 is on rank 36, so the T600 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar P106-100

#23

Intel Arc Pro B60

MSRP: $500|Avg: $450

93%

#24

Radeon PRO W7600

MSRP: $599|Avg: $599

93%

#25

RTX 2000 Ada Generation

MSRP: $625|Avg: $750

93%

#28

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

499%

#43

P106-100

MSRP: $224|Avg: $30

100%

#48

Quadro K3100M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $400

96%

#50

Quadro K5000M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $509

95%

#51

Radeon PRO W6300

MSRP: $200|Avg: $150

94%

#52

Quadro K4100M

MSRP: $1499|Avg: $261

94%

#58

Quadro K2000M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30

85%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar T600

#16

Radeon PRO W7500

MSRP: $429|Avg: $401

96%

#18

Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $340

95%

#19

RTX A2000 12GB

MSRP: $449|Avg: $380

95%

#20

Radeon Pro Vega 56

MSRP: $399|Avg: $60

94%

#21

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

460%

#21

RTX A2000

MSRP: $450|Avg: $320

93%

#36

T600

MSRP: $200|Avg: $180

100%

#43

P106-100

MSRP: $224|Avg: $30

92%

#48

Quadro K3100M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $400

89%

#50

Quadro K5000M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $509

87%

#51

Radeon PRO W6300

MSRP: $200|Avg: $150

87%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The T600 uses modern memory architecture. The T600 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The P106-100 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The P106-100 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the T600.

Insight	P106-100	T600
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+3.2%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.2%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021))	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	Standard Size (250mm)	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The P106-100 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $30 versus $180 for the T600, it costs 83% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 519% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	P106-100	T600
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+519%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($30)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($180)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

P106-100 Benchmark Check

T600 Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of P106-100 and T600

P106-100

The P106-100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 12 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,628 points.

T600

The T600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1335 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,425 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The P106-100 scores 6,628 and the T600 reaches 6,425 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The P106-100 is built on Pascal while the T600 uses Turing, both on 16 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (P106-100) vs 640 (T600). Raw compute: 6.655 TFLOPS (P106-100) vs 1.709 TFLOPS (T600). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1335 MHz.

Feature	P106-100	T600
G3D Mark Score	6,628+3%	6,425
Architecture	Pascal	Turing
Process Node	16 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	1920+200%	640
Compute (TFLOPS)	6.655 TFLOPS+289%	1.709 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1733 MHz+30%	1335 MHz
ROPs	64+100%	32
TMUs	120+200%	40
L1 Cache	720 KB+13%	640 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	P106-100	T600
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (P106-100) vs 1 MB (T600) — the P106-100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	P106-100	T600
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_1 (P106-100) vs 12 (12_1) (T600). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.

Feature	P106-100	T600
DirectX	12_1	12 (12_1)
Max Displays	0	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (P106-100) vs 7th Gen NVENC (Turing) (T600). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd Gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC.

Feature	P106-100	T600
Encoder	NVENC 6th Gen	7th Gen NVENC (Turing)
Decoder	NVDEC 3rd Gen	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	—	H.264,HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The P106-100 draws 75W versus the T600's 40W — a 60.9% difference. The T600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (P106-100) vs 350W (T600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 250mm vs 156mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.

Feature	P106-100	T600
TDP	75W	40W-47%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	250mm	156mm
Height	—	69mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	—	65°C
Perf/Watt	88.4	160.6+82%

💰

Value Analysis

The P106-100 launched at $224 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the T600 launched at $200 and now averages $180. The P106-100 costs 83.3% less ($150 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 220.9 (P106-100) vs 35.7 (T600) — the P106-100 offers 518.8% better value. The T600 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2017).