Quadro 2000 D vs FirePro 3D V5800
Quadro 2000 D
Popular choices:
FirePro 3D V5800
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro 2000 D is positioned at rank 288 and the FirePro 3D V5800 is on rank 264, so the FirePro 3D V5800 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro 2000 D
Performance Per Dollar FirePro 3D V5800
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro 2000 D is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (4 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro 3D V5800.
| Insight | Quadro 2000 D | FirePro 3D V5800 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro 3D V5800 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro 3D V5800 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $35), it costs 14% less, resulting in a 16% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro 2000 D | FirePro 3D V5800 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+16%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($35) | ✅More affordable ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro 2000 D and FirePro 3D V5800
Quadro 2000 D
The Quadro 2000 D is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 5 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 62W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,239 points. Launch price was $599.
FirePro 3D V5800
The FirePro 3D V5800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 690 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 74W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,232 points. Launch price was $479.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro 2000 D scores 1,239 and the FirePro 3D V5800 reaches 1,232 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 2000 D is built on Fermi while the FirePro 3D V5800 uses TeraScale 2, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 192 (Quadro 2000 D) vs 800 (FirePro 3D V5800). Raw compute: 0.48 TFLOPS (Quadro 2000 D) vs 1.104 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V5800).
| Feature | Quadro 2000 D | FirePro 3D V5800 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,239 | 1,232 |
| Architecture | Fermi | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 800+317% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.48 TFLOPS | 1.104 TFLOPS+130% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 40+25% |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB+220% | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro 2000 D | FirePro 3D V5800 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro 2000 D comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro 3D V5800 has 1 GB. The Quadro 2000 D offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Quadro 2000 D | FirePro 3D V5800 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+300% | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (Quadro 2000 D) vs 11.0 (FirePro 3D V5800). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.
| Feature | Quadro 2000 D | FirePro 3D V5800 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0)+9% | 11.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+12% | 4.1 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 3+50% |
Media & Encoding
Decoder: NVDEC 1 vs UVD 2.3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 (Quadro 2000 D) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro 3D V5800).
| Feature | Quadro 2000 D | FirePro 3D V5800 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | — | UVD 2.3 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 1 | UVD 2.3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro 2000 D draws 62W versus the FirePro 3D V5800's 74W — a 17.6% difference. The Quadro 2000 D is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 2000 D) vs 350W (FirePro 3D V5800). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 178mm vs 229mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 90°C.
| Feature | Quadro 2000 D | FirePro 3D V5800 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 62W-16% | 74W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 178mm | 229mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-17% | 90°C |
| Perf/Watt | 20.0+20% | 16.6 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro 2000 D launched at $599 MSRP and currently averages $35, while the FirePro 3D V5800 launched at $479 and now averages $30. The FirePro 3D V5800 costs 14.3% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 35.4 (Quadro 2000 D) vs 41.1 (FirePro 3D V5800) — the FirePro 3D V5800 offers 16.1% better value. The Quadro 2000 D is the newer GPU (2011 vs 2010).
| Feature | Quadro 2000 D | FirePro 3D V5800 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $479-20% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $35 | $30-14% |
| Performance per Dollar | 35.4 | 41.1+16% |
| Codename | GF106 | Juniper |
| Release | October 5 2011 | April 26 2010 |
| Ranking | #892 | #780 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro 2000 D and FirePro 3D V5800
