Quadro 2000 D vs GeForce GTX 760A
Quadro 2000 D
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 760A
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro 2000 D is positioned at rank 288 and the GeForce GTX 760A is on rank 483, so the Quadro 2000 D offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro 2000 D
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 760A
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro 2000 D is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 760A.
| Insight | Quadro 2000 D | GeForce GTX 760A |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+700%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro 2000 D offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro 2000 D holds the technical lead. Priced at $35 (vs $40), it costs 13% less, resulting in a 15.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro 2000 D | GeForce GTX 760A |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+15.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($35) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro 2000 D and GeForce GTX 760A
Quadro 2000 D
The Quadro 2000 D is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 5 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 62W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,239 points. Launch price was $599.
GeForce GTX 760A
The GeForce GTX 760A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 17 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 628 MHz to 657 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,226 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro 2000 D scores 1,239 and the GeForce GTX 760A reaches 1,226 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 2000 D is built on Fermi while the GeForce GTX 760A uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (Quadro 2000 D) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 760A). Raw compute: 0.48 TFLOPS (Quadro 2000 D) vs 1.009 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 760A).
| Feature | Quadro 2000 D | GeForce GTX 760A |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,239+1% | 1,226 |
| Architecture | Fermi | Kepler |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 768+300% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.48 TFLOPS | 1.009 TFLOPS+110% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 64+100% |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB+300% | 64 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro 2000 D | GeForce GTX 760A |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro 2000 D comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 760A has 512 MB. The Quadro 2000 D offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Quadro 2000 D | GeForce GTX 760A |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+700% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (Quadro 2000 D) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 760A). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro 2000 D | GeForce GTX 760A |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Decoder: NVDEC 1 vs PureVideo HD VP5. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 (Quadro 2000 D) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 760A).
| Feature | Quadro 2000 D | GeForce GTX 760A |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | — | NVENC 1st Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 1 | PureVideo HD VP5 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro 2000 D draws 62W versus the GeForce GTX 760A's 55W — a 12% difference. The GeForce GTX 760A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 2000 D) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 760A). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Quadro 2000 D | GeForce GTX 760A |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 62W | 55W-11% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 178mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 20.0 | 22.3+12% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro 2000 D launched at $599 MSRP and currently averages $35, while the GeForce GTX 760A launched at $249 and now averages $40. The Quadro 2000 D costs 12.5% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 35.4 (Quadro 2000 D) vs 30.6 (GeForce GTX 760A) — the Quadro 2000 D offers 15.7% better value. The GeForce GTX 760A is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2011).
| Feature | Quadro 2000 D | GeForce GTX 760A |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $249-58% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $35-13% | $40 |
| Performance per Dollar | 35.4+16% | 30.6 |
| Codename | GF106 | GK106 |
| Release | October 5 2011 | March 17 2014 |
| Ranking | #892 | #813 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro 2000 D and GeForce GTX 760A
