Quadro 2000 D vs GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Quadro 2000 D
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro 2000 D is positioned at rank #288 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro 2000 D
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is significantly newer (2022 vs 2011). The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro 2000 D lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 911.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro 2000 D.
| Insight | Quadro 2000 D | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-911.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+911.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014)) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $209 (vs $35), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 69.4% better value per dollar than the Quadro 2000 D.
| Insight | Quadro 2000 D | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+69.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($35) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($209) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro 2000 D and GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Quadro 2000 D
The Quadro 2000 D is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 5 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 62W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,239 points. Launch price was $599.
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1552 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,535 points. Launch price was $249.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Quadro 2000 D scores 1,239 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB's 12,535 — the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB leads by 911.7%. The Quadro 2000 D is built on Fermi while the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB uses Ampere, both on 40 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 192 (Quadro 2000 D) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Raw compute: 0.48 TFLOPS (Quadro 2000 D) vs 9.098 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB).
| Feature | Quadro 2000 D | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,239 | 12,535+912% |
| Architecture | Fermi | Ampere |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 2560+1233% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.48 TFLOPS | 9.098 TFLOPS+1795% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 32 | 80+150% |
| L1 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2.5 MB+900% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro 2000 D | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro 2000 D comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Quadro 2000 D) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro 2000 D | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (Quadro 2000 D) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro 2000 D | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 Ultimate |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Decoder: NVDEC 1 vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 (Quadro 2000 D) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB).
| Feature | Quadro 2000 D | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | — | NVENC 7th gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 1 | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro 2000 D draws 62W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB's 130W — a 70.8% difference. The Quadro 2000 D is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 2000 D) vs 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 178mm vs 242mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 66°C.
| Feature | Quadro 2000 D | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 62W-52% | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 178mm | 242mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 66°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 20.0 | 96.4+382% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro 2000 D launched at $599 MSRP and currently averages $35, while the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB launched at $249 and now averages $209. The Quadro 2000 D costs 83.3% less ($174 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 35.4 (Quadro 2000 D) vs 60.0 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers 69.5% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2011).
| Feature | Quadro 2000 D | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $249-58% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $35-83% | $209 |
| Performance per Dollar | 35.4 | 60.0+69% |
| Codename | GF106 | GA106 |
| Release | October 5 2011 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #892 | #211 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro 2000 D and GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
