Quadro 2000 D vs HD Graphics P630

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Quadro 2000 D

62

1,239

0.0%

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)

GeForce GTX 1070 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 2080 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop GPU

HD Graphics P630

15

1,280

+3.3%

UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro 2000 D is positioned at rank #288 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro 2000 D

#111

Tesla P40

MSRP: $5699|Avg: $150

100%

#112

GRID RTX6000-1Q

MSRP: $6299|Avg: $1500

97%

#113

Quadro RTX 8000

MSRP: $9999|Avg: $9999

96%

#114

Quadro GP100

MSRP: $7000|Avg: $1335

95%

#115

Radeon Instinct MI60

MSRP: $6000|Avg: $600

94%

#272

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

7137%

#288

Quadro 2000 D

MSRP: $599|Avg: $35

100%

#289

FirePro V5900

MSRP: $599|Avg: $15

100%

#290

FirePro S9000

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $156

98%

#293

GRID P40-4Q

MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150

96%

#294

RTXA5000-8Q

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $2500

95%

#296

GRID P6-2Q

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $150

95%

#298

FirePro W9100

MSRP: $4000|Avg: $200

94%

#299

GRID K220Q

MSRP: $469|Avg: $40

94%

#301

GRID T4-8Q

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $1000

92%

#302

FirePro 3D V3700

MSRP: $99|Avg: $10

87%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The HD Graphics P630 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro 2000 D offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Quadro 2000 D	HD Graphics P630
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.3%)	✅Leading raw performance (+3.3%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Generation 9.5 (2016−2020))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the HD Graphics P630 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro 2000 D Benchmark Check

HD Graphics P630 Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro 2000 D and HD Graphics P630

Quadro 2000 D

The Quadro 2000 D is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 5 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 62W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,239 points. Launch price was $599.

HD Graphics P630

The HD Graphics P630 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 5 2016. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,280 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro 2000 D scores 1,239 and the HD Graphics P630 reaches 1,280 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 2000 D is built on Fermi while the HD Graphics P630 uses Generation 9.5, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm++. Shader units: 192 (Quadro 2000 D) vs 192 (HD Graphics P630). Raw compute: 0.48 TFLOPS (Quadro 2000 D) vs 0.4224 TFLOPS (HD Graphics P630).

Feature	Quadro 2000 D	HD Graphics P630
G3D Mark Score	1,239	1,280+3%
Architecture	Fermi	Generation 9.5
Process Node	40 nm	14 nm++
Shading Units	192	192
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.48 TFLOPS+14%	0.4224 TFLOPS
ROPs	16+433%	3
TMUs	32+33%	24

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro 2000 D	HD Graphics P630
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro 2000 D comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the HD Graphics P630 has 0 MB. The Quadro 2000 D offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.

Feature	Quadro 2000 D	HD Graphics P630
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Bus Width	64-bit	System

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (Quadro 2000 D) vs 12 (12_1) (HD Graphics P630). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.

Feature	Quadro 2000 D	HD Graphics P630
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	2	3+50%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Decoder: NVDEC 1 vs Quick Sync Video. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 (Quadro 2000 D) vs H.265/HEVC,H.264,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2 (HD Graphics P630).

Feature	Quadro 2000 D	HD Graphics P630
Encoder	—	Quick Sync Video
Decoder	NVDEC 1	Quick Sync Video
Codecs	MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264	H.265/HEVC,H.264,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro 2000 D draws 62W versus the HD Graphics P630's 15W — a 122.1% difference. The HD Graphics P630 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 2000 D) vs 1W (HD Graphics P630). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.

Feature	Quadro 2000 D	HD Graphics P630
TDP	62W	15W-76%
Recommended PSU	350W	1W-100%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Integrated
Length	178mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	75°C	75°C
Perf/Watt	20.0	85.3+326%

💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro 2000 D launched at $599 MSRP and currently averages $35, while the HD Graphics P630 launched at $0 and now averages $0. The HD Graphics P630 costs 100+% less ($35 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 35.4 (Quadro 2000 D) vs Infinity (HD Graphics P630) — the HD Graphics P630 offers Infinity% better value. The HD Graphics P630 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2011).