Quadro 2000 D vs GeForce GTX 560M
Quadro 2000 D
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 560M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro 2000 D is positioned at rank 288 and the GeForce GTX 560M is on rank 165, so the GeForce GTX 560M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro 2000 D
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 560M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 560M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro 2000 D offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro 2000 D | GeForce GTX 560M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+33.3%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 560M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro 2000 D and GeForce GTX 560M
Quadro 2000 D
The Quadro 2000 D is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 5 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 62W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,239 points. Launch price was $599.
GeForce GTX 560M
The GeForce GTX 560M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 775 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,281 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro 2000 D scores 1,239 and the GeForce GTX 560M reaches 1,281 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 2000 D is built on Fermi while the GeForce GTX 560M uses Fermi 2.0, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 192 (Quadro 2000 D) vs 192 (GeForce GTX 560M). Raw compute: 0.48 TFLOPS (Quadro 2000 D) vs 0.5952 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560M).
| Feature | Quadro 2000 D | GeForce GTX 560M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,239 | 1,281+3% |
| Architecture | Fermi | Fermi 2.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.48 TFLOPS | 0.5952 TFLOPS+24% |
| ROPs | 16 | 24+50% |
| TMUs | 32 | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 384 KB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro 2000 D | GeForce GTX 560M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro 2000 D comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 560M has 3 GB. The Quadro 2000 D offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro 2000 D) vs 384 KB (GeForce GTX 560M) — the GeForce GTX 560M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro 2000 D | GeForce GTX 560M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+33% | 3 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 384 KB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (Quadro 2000 D) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 560M). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.0. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Quadro 2000 D | GeForce GTX 560M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6+15% | 4.0 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Decoder: NVDEC 1 vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 (Quadro 2000 D) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 560M).
| Feature | Quadro 2000 D | GeForce GTX 560M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | — | PureVideo HD VP4 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 1 | PureVideo HD VP4 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro 2000 D draws 62W versus the GeForce GTX 560M's 75W — a 19% difference. The Quadro 2000 D is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 2000 D) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 560M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Quadro 2000 D | GeForce GTX 560M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 62W-17% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 178mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 20.0+17% | 17.1 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro 2000 D and GeForce GTX 560M
