Quadro 2000 D vs Intel UHD Graphics 630
Quadro 2000 D
Popular choices:
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro 2000 D is positioned at rank #288 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro 2000 D
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Intel UHD Graphics 630 is significantly newer (2017 vs 2011). The Intel UHD Graphics 630 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro 2000 D lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro 2000 D is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (4 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Intel UHD Graphics 630.
| Insight | Quadro 2000 D | Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro 2000 D remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro 2000 D and Intel UHD Graphics 630
Quadro 2000 D
The Quadro 2000 D is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 5 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 62W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,239 points. Launch price was $599.
Intel UHD Graphics 630
The Intel UHD Graphics 630 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 1 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 184 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,231 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro 2000 D scores 1,239 and the Intel UHD Graphics 630 reaches 1,231 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 2000 D is built on Fermi while the Intel UHD Graphics 630 uses Generation 9.5, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm+++. Shader units: 192 (Quadro 2000 D) vs 184 (Intel UHD Graphics 630). Raw compute: 0.48 TFLOPS (Quadro 2000 D) vs 0.4232 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 630).
| Feature | Quadro 2000 D | Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,239 | 1,231 |
| Architecture | Fermi | Generation 9.5 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 14 nm+++ |
| Shading Units | 192+4% | 184 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.48 TFLOPS+13% | 0.4232 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16+433% | 3 |
| TMUs | 32+39% | 23 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro 2000 D | Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro 2000 D comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Intel UHD Graphics 630 has 0 MB. The Quadro 2000 D offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | Quadro 2000 D | Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro 2000 D draws 62W versus the Intel UHD Graphics 630's 15W — a 122.1% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 630 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 2000 D) vs 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 630). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.
| Feature | Quadro 2000 D | Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 62W | 15W-76% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 178mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 20.0 | 82.1+310% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro 2000 D launched at $599 MSRP and currently averages $35, while the Intel UHD Graphics 630 launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Intel UHD Graphics 630 costs 100+% less ($35 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 35.4 (Quadro 2000 D) vs Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics 630) — the Intel UHD Graphics 630 offers Infinity% better value. The Intel UHD Graphics 630 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2011).
| Feature | Quadro 2000 D | Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $35 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 35.4 | Infinity |
| Codename | GF106 | Comet Lake GT2 |
| Release | October 5 2011 | October 1 2017 |
| Ranking | #892 | #824 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro 2000 D and Intel UHD Graphics 630
