Quadro 2000 D vs GeForce 930MX
Quadro 2000 D
Popular choices:
GeForce 930MX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro 2000 D is positioned at rank 288 and the GeForce 930MX is on rank 289, so the Quadro 2000 D offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro 2000 D
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 930MX
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 930MX is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro 2000 D offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro 2000 D | GeForce 930MX |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 930MX offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 930MX holds the technical lead. Priced at $25 (vs $35), it costs 29% less, resulting in a 44.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro 2000 D | GeForce 930MX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+44.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($35) | ✅More affordable ($25) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro 2000 D and GeForce 930MX
Quadro 2000 D
The Quadro 2000 D is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 5 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 62W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,239 points. Launch price was $599.
GeForce 930MX
The GeForce 930MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 952 MHz to 1020 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 17W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,278 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro 2000 D scores 1,239 and the GeForce 930MX reaches 1,278 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 2000 D is built on Fermi while the GeForce 930MX uses Maxwell, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (Quadro 2000 D) vs 384 (GeForce 930MX). Raw compute: 0.48 TFLOPS (Quadro 2000 D) vs 0.7834 TFLOPS (GeForce 930MX).
| Feature | Quadro 2000 D | GeForce 930MX |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,239 | 1,278+3% |
| Architecture | Fermi | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 384+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.48 TFLOPS | 0.7834 TFLOPS+63% |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 32+33% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB+33% | 192 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro 2000 D | GeForce 930MX |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro 2000 D comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce 930MX has 2 GB. The Quadro 2000 D offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Quadro 2000 D) vs 1 MB (GeForce 930MX) — the GeForce 930MX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro 2000 D | GeForce 930MX |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (Quadro 2000 D) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce 930MX). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.
| Feature | Quadro 2000 D | GeForce 930MX |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Decoder: NVDEC 1 vs PureVideo HD (VP6). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 (Quadro 2000 D) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce 930MX).
| Feature | Quadro 2000 D | GeForce 930MX |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | — | None |
| Decoder | NVDEC 1 | PureVideo HD (VP6) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro 2000 D draws 62W versus the GeForce 930MX's 17W — a 113.9% difference. The GeForce 930MX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 2000 D) vs 350W (GeForce 930MX). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 178mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80.
| Feature | Quadro 2000 D | GeForce 930MX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 62W | 17W-73% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 178mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 20.0 | 75.2+276% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro 2000 D launched at $599 MSRP and currently averages $35, while the GeForce 930MX launched at $80 and now averages $25. The GeForce 930MX costs 28.6% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 35.4 (Quadro 2000 D) vs 51.1 (GeForce 930MX) — the GeForce 930MX offers 44.4% better value. The GeForce 930MX is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2011).
| Feature | Quadro 2000 D | GeForce 930MX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $80-87% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $35 | $25-29% |
| Performance per Dollar | 35.4 | 51.1+44% |
| Codename | GF106 | GM108 |
| Release | October 5 2011 | March 1 2016 |
| Ranking | #892 | #805 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro 2000 D and GeForce 930MX
