Quadro 2000 D vs GeForce GTX 460M

Quadro 2000 D

2011Core: 625 MHz

GeForce GTX 460M

2010Core: 675 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Quadro 2000 D

1,239

+1.7%

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)

GeForce GTX 1070 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 2080 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop GPU

GeForce GTX 460M

1,218

0.0%

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)

GeForce GTX 1070 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 2080 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro 2000 D is positioned at rank 288 and the GeForce GTX 460M is on rank 181, so the GeForce GTX 460M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro 2000 D

#111

Tesla P40

MSRP: $5699|Avg: $150

100%

#112

GRID RTX6000-1Q

MSRP: $6299|Avg: $1500

97%

#113

Quadro RTX 8000

MSRP: $9999|Avg: $9999

96%

#114

Quadro GP100

MSRP: $7000|Avg: $1335

95%

#115

Radeon Instinct MI60

MSRP: $6000|Avg: $600

94%

#272

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

7137%

#288

Quadro 2000 D

MSRP: $599|Avg: $35

100%

#289

FirePro V5900

MSRP: $599|Avg: $15

100%

#290

FirePro S9000

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $156

98%

#293

GRID P40-4Q

MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150

96%

#294

RTXA5000-8Q

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $2500

95%

#296

GRID P6-2Q

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $150

95%

#298

FirePro W9100

MSRP: $4000|Avg: $200

94%

#299

GRID K220Q

MSRP: $469|Avg: $40

94%

#301

GRID T4-8Q

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $1000

92%

#302

FirePro 3D V3700

MSRP: $99|Avg: $10

87%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 460M

#171

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

357%

#173

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

323%

#174

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

322%

#178

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

293%

#179

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

291%

#181

GeForce GTX 460M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40

100%

#182

Radeon 6750M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $25

100%

#183

GeForce GT 525M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30

99%

#186

Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)

MSRP: $50|Avg: $50

99%

#187

GeForce MX550

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

98%

#195

GeForce GT625M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $45

92%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro 2000 D is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score and 166.7% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 460M.

Insight	Quadro 2000 D	GeForce GTX 460M
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+1.7%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+166.7%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

The Quadro 2000 D offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro 2000 D holds the technical lead. Priced at $35 (vs $40), it costs 13% less, resulting in a 16.3% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Quadro 2000 D	GeForce GTX 460M
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+16.3%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($35)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro 2000 D Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 460M Benchmark Check

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro 2000 D and GeForce GTX 460M

Quadro 2000 D

The Quadro 2000 D is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 5 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 62W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,239 points. Launch price was $599.

GeForce GTX 460M

The GeForce GTX 460M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 3 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,218 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro 2000 D scores 1,239 and the GeForce GTX 460M reaches 1,218 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 2000 D is built on Fermi while the GeForce GTX 460M uses Fermi, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 192 (Quadro 2000 D) vs 192 (GeForce GTX 460M). Raw compute: 0.48 TFLOPS (Quadro 2000 D) vs 0.5184 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 460M).

Feature	Quadro 2000 D	GeForce GTX 460M
G3D Mark Score	1,239+2%	1,218
Architecture	Fermi	Fermi
Process Node	40 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	192	192
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.48 TFLOPS	0.5184 TFLOPS+8%
ROPs	16	24+50%
TMUs	32	32
L1 Cache	256 KB	256 KB
L2 Cache	256 KB	384 KB+50%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro 2000 D	GeForce GTX 460M
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro 2000 D comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 460M has 2 GB. The Quadro 2000 D offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro 2000 D) vs 384 KB (GeForce GTX 460M) — the GeForce GTX 460M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro 2000 D	GeForce GTX 460M
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+167%	1.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB	384 KB+50%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (Quadro 2000 D) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 460M). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	Quadro 2000 D	GeForce GTX 460M
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Decoder: NVDEC 1 vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 (Quadro 2000 D) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 460M).

Feature	Quadro 2000 D	GeForce GTX 460M
Encoder	—	PureVideo HD VP4
Decoder	NVDEC 1	PureVideo HD VP4
Codecs	MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro 2000 D draws 62W versus the GeForce GTX 460M's 50W — a 21.4% difference. The GeForce GTX 460M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 2000 D) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 460M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.

Feature	Quadro 2000 D	GeForce GTX 460M
TDP	62W	50W-19%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	178mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	75°C-6%	80°C
Perf/Watt	20.0	24.4+22%

💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro 2000 D costs 12.5% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 35.4 (Quadro 2000 D) vs 30.4 (GeForce GTX 460M) — the Quadro 2000 D offers 16.4% better value. The Quadro 2000 D is the newer GPU (2011 vs 2010).