Quadro FX 1700 vs Radeon R2E

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 1700 vs Radeon R2E FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 1700 vs Radeon R2E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 1700

2008

Why buy it

✅22.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌243.6% higher power demand at 189W vs 55W.

Radeon R2E

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 55W instead of 189W, a 134W reduction.
✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro FX 1700 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $699 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro FX 1700 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 22.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.4% in PassMark G3D (216 vs 211), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro FX 1700 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro FX 1700 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Quadro FX 1700 vs Radeon R2E Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro FX 1700

The Quadro FX 1700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 216 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Radeon R2E

The Radeon R2E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 20 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 211 points. Launch price was $109.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 1700 scores 216 and the Radeon R2E reaches 211 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 1700 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon R2E uses GCN 1.0, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 1700) vs 512 (Radeon R2E). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 1700) vs 0.8192 TFLOPS (Radeon R2E).

Feature	Quadro FX 1700	Radeon R2E
G3D Mark Score	216+2%	211
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	55 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	240	512+113%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6221 TFLOPS	0.8192 TFLOPS+32%
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	80+150%	32
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro FX 1700	Radeon R2E
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 1700 and 64-bit on the Radeon R2E.

Feature	Quadro FX 1700	Radeon R2E
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 1700 draws 189W versus the Radeon R2E's 55W — a 109.8% difference. The Radeon R2E is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 1700) vs 350W (Radeon R2E). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Quadro FX 1700	Radeon R2E
TDP	189W	55W-71%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	168mm	—
Slots	1	—
Perf/Watt	1.1	3.8+245%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro FX 1700 came in at $699, while the Radeon R2E launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon R2E was 100+% cheaper ($699 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.3 (Quadro FX 1700) vs Infinity (Radeon R2E) — the Radeon R2E offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R2E (2013 vs 2008).

Feature	Quadro FX 1700	Radeon R2E
MSRP	$699	$0-100%
Performance per Dollar	0.3	Infinity
Codename	GT200B	Cape Verde
Release	November 11 2008	December 20 2013
Ranking	#815	#738

Search Quadro FX 1700 on Amazon

Search Radeon R2E on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.