Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon HD 3300

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 3800

2008Core: 610 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 3300

2011Core: 750 MHz

Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon HD 3300 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon HD 3300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon HD 3300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 3800

2008

Why buy it

  • βœ…384.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • βœ…100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

  • ❌2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌
    2563.3% HIGHER MSRP
    $799 MSRPvs$30 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.0 vs 4.2 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $30 MSRP).

Radeon HD 3300

2011

Why buy it

  • βœ…Costs $769 less on MSRP ($30 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
  • βœ…Delivers 310.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.2 vs 1.0 G3D/$ ($30 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
  • βœ…More future proof: TeraScale 3 (2010βˆ’2013) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro FX 3800 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro FX 3800 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 384.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 548.8% in PassMark G3D (824 vs 127), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro FX 3800 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 3300 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $769 cheaper on MSRP at $30 vs $799, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 310.5% (4.2 vs 1.0), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 3300 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro FX 3800 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon HD 3300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 3800

The Quadro FX 3800 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 824 points. Launch price was $3,499.

AMD

Radeon HD 3300

The Radeon HD 3300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 127 points. Launch price was $180.

⚑

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Quadro FX 3800 scores 824 versus the Radeon HD 3300's 127 β€” the Quadro FX 3800 leads by 548.8%. The Quadro FX 3800 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon HD 3300 uses TeraScale 3, both on 55 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 3800) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 3300). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3800) vs 1.92 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 3300).

FeatureQuadro FX 3800Radeon HD 3300
G3D Mark Score
824+549%
127
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TeraScale 3
Process Node
55 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
240
1280+433%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6221 TFLOPS
1.92 TFLOPS+209%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
80
80
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro FX 3800Radeon HD 3300
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
πŸ’Ύ

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 3800 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 3300 carries 512 MB. Quadro FX 3800 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 3800 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 3300. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro FX 3800) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 3300) β€” the Radeon HD 3300 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro FX 3800Radeon HD 3300
VRAM Capacity
1 GB+100%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
πŸ–₯️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10_0 (Quadro FX 3800) vs 10.0 (Radeon HD 3300). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureQuadro FX 3800Radeon HD 3300
DirectX
10_0
10.0
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD (Quadro FX 3800) vs Legacy (Radeon HD 3300). Decoder: PureVideo HD vs UVD+.

FeatureQuadro FX 3800Radeon HD 3300
Encoder
PureVideo HD
Legacy
Decoder
PureVideo HD
UVD+
Codecs
β€”
H.264/AVC,VC-1
πŸ”Œ

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 3800 draws 189W versus the Radeon HD 3300's 186W β€” a 1.6% difference. The Radeon HD 3300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 3800) vs 350W (Radeon HD 3300). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureQuadro FX 3800Radeon HD 3300
TDP
189W
186W-2%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Length
1mm
β€”
Slots
1
0-100%
Perf/Watt
4.4+529%
0.7
πŸ’°

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro FX 3800 came in at $799, while the Radeon HD 3300 launched at $30. On MSRP, Radeon HD 3300 was 96.2% cheaper ($769 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.0 (Quadro FX 3800) vs 4.2 (Radeon HD 3300) β€” the Radeon HD 3300 offers 320% better value. The newer card here is Radeon HD 3300 (2011 vs 2008).

FeatureQuadro FX 3800Radeon HD 3300
MSRP
$799
$30-96%
Performance per Dollar
1.0
4.2+320%
Codename
GT200B
Cayman
Release
November 11 2008
December 1 2011
Ranking
#815
#598

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.