
Quadro GP100 vs GeForce GTX 1060

Quadro GP100
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro GP100
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro GP100 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 36.2% higher G3D Mark score and 166.7% more VRAM (16 GB vs 6 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1060.
| Insight | Quadro GP100 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+36.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-36.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+166.7%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 1060 holds the technical lead. Priced at $60 (vs $1,335), it costs 96% less, resulting in a 1533.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro GP100 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1533.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,335) | ✅More affordable ($60) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro GP100 and GeForce GTX 1060

Quadro GP100
The Quadro GP100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1304 MHz to 1442 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 235W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,710 points.

GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Quadro GP100 scores 13,710 versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 10,064 — the Quadro GP100 leads by 36.2%. The Quadro GP100 is built on Pascal while the GeForce GTX 1060 uses Pascal, both on a 16 nm process. Shader units: 3,584 (Quadro GP100) vs 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060). Raw compute: 10.34 TFLOPS (Quadro GP100) vs 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060). Boost clocks: 1442 MHz vs 1733 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,710+36% | 10,064 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+40% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.34 TFLOPS+17% | 8.873 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1442 MHz | 1733 MHz+20% |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 224+40% | 160 |
| L1 Cache | 1.3 MB+38% | 0.94 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro GP100 comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB. The Quadro GP100 offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 1024 GB/s (Quadro GP100) vs 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) — a 433.3% advantage for the Quadro GP100. Bus width: 4096-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Quadro GP100) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) — the Quadro GP100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+167% | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 1024 GB/s+433% | 192 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 4096-bit+2033% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (Quadro GP100) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1060). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 4th gen (Quadro GP100) vs NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd gen vs NVDEC (Pascal). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8,VP9 (Quadro GP100) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060).
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 4th gen | NVENC (Pascal) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3rd gen | NVDEC (Pascal) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro GP100 draws 235W versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 180W — a 26.5% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro GP100) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 1060). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 173mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 235W | 180W-23% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 400W-20% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 173mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 58.3+4% | 55.9 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro GP100 launched at $7000 MSRP and currently averages $1335, while the GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 and now averages $60. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 95.5% less ($1275 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 10.3 (Quadro GP100) vs 167.7 (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 1528.2% better value.
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $7000 | $249-96% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1335 | $60-96% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.3 | 167.7+1528% |
| Codename | GP100 | GP104 |
| Release | October 1 2016 | May 27 2016 |
| Ranking | #178 | #137 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















