Quadro GP100 vs GeForce RTX 3070
Quadro GP100
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro GP100
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3070
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 3070 uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce RTX 3070 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro GP100 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 61.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro GP100 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro GP100 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-61.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+61.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3070 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $200 versus $1,335 for the Quadro GP100, it costs 85% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 979.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro GP100 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+979.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,335) | ✅More affordable ($200) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro GP100 and GeForce RTX 3070
Quadro GP100
The Quadro GP100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1304 MHz to 1442 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 235W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,710 points.
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Quadro GP100 scores 13,710 versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 22,172 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 61.7%. The Quadro GP100 is built on Pascal while the GeForce RTX 3070 uses Ampere, both on 16 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Quadro GP100) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070). Raw compute: 10.34 TFLOPS (Quadro GP100) vs 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070). Boost clocks: 1442 MHz vs 1725 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,710 | 22,172+62% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Ampere |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584 | 5888+64% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.34 TFLOPS | 20.31 TFLOPS+96% |
| Boost Clock | 1442 MHz | 1725 MHz+20% |
| ROPs | 96 | 96 |
| TMUs | 224+22% | 184 |
| L1 Cache | 1.3 MB | 5.8 MB+346% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro GP100 comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3070 has 8 GB. The Quadro GP100 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 1024 GB/s (Quadro GP100) vs 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3070) — a 128.6% advantage for the Quadro GP100. Bus width: 4096-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | HBM2 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 1024 GB/s+129% | 448 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 4096-bit+1500% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (Quadro GP100) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 4th gen (Quadro GP100) vs NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd gen vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8,VP9 (Quadro GP100) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070).
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 4th gen | NVENC 7th gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3rd gen | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro GP100 draws 235W versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 220W — a 6.6% difference. The GeForce RTX 3070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro GP100) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 3070). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 242mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 235W | 220W-6% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-23% | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 242mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 58.3 | 100.8+73% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro GP100 launched at $7000 MSRP and currently averages $1335, while the GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 and now averages $200. The GeForce RTX 3070 costs 85% less ($1135 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 10.3 (Quadro GP100) vs 110.9 (GeForce RTX 3070) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 976.7% better value. The GeForce RTX 3070 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2016).
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $7000 | $499-93% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1335 | $200-85% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.3 | 110.9+977% |
| Codename | GP100 | GA104 |
| Release | October 1 2016 | September 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #178 | #63 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro GP100 and GeForce RTX 3070
