Quadro GP100 vs Arc B570
Quadro GP100
Popular choices:
Arc B570
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro GP100
Performance Per Dollar Arc B570
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Arc B570 is significantly newer (2025 vs 2016). The Arc B570 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro GP100 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Arc B570 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro GP100 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro GP100 | Arc B570 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Xe2 (2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (249mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Arc B570 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $219 versus $1,335 for the Quadro GP100, it costs 84% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 525.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro GP100 | Arc B570 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+525.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,335) | ✅More affordable ($219) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro GP100 and Arc B570
Quadro GP100
The Quadro GP100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1304 MHz to 1442 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 235W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,710 points.
Arc B570
The Arc B570 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 16 2025. It features the Xe2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2500 MHz to 2500 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,060 points. Launch price was $219.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro GP100 scores 13,710 and the Arc B570 reaches 14,060 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro GP100 is built on Pascal while the Arc B570 uses Xe2, both on 16 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Quadro GP100) vs 2,304 (Arc B570). Raw compute: 10.34 TFLOPS (Quadro GP100) vs 11.52 TFLOPS (Arc B570). Boost clocks: 1442 MHz vs 2500 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | Arc B570 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,710 | 14,060+3% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Xe2 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+56% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.34 TFLOPS | 11.52 TFLOPS+11% |
| Boost Clock | 1442 MHz | 2500 MHz+73% |
| ROPs | 96+20% | 80 |
| TMUs | 224+56% | 144 |
| L1 Cache | 1.3 MB | 4.5 MB+246% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 18 MB+350% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | Arc B570 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro GP100 comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the Arc B570 has 8 GB. The Quadro GP100 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 1024 GB/s (Quadro GP100) vs 380 GB/s (Arc B570) — a 169.5% advantage for the Quadro GP100. Bus width: 4096-bit vs 160-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Quadro GP100) vs 18 MB (Arc B570) — the Arc B570 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | Arc B570 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | HBM2 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 1024 GB/s+169% | 380 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 4096-bit+2460% | 160-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 18 MB+350% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (Quadro GP100) vs 12 Ultimate (Arc B570). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | Arc B570 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 4th gen (Quadro GP100) vs Intel Xe Media (Arc B570). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd gen vs Intel Xe Media. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8,VP9 (Quadro GP100) vs AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 (Arc B570).
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | Arc B570 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 4th gen | Intel Xe Media |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3rd gen | Intel Xe Media |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8,VP9 | AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro GP100 draws 235W versus the Arc B570's 150W — a 44.2% difference. The Arc B570 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro GP100) vs 600W (Arc B570). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 249mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | Arc B570 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 235W | 150W-36% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-17% | 600W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 249mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 58.3 | 93.7+61% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro GP100 launched at $7000 MSRP and currently averages $1335, while the Arc B570 launched at $219 and now averages $219. The Arc B570 costs 83.6% less ($1116 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 10.3 (Quadro GP100) vs 64.2 (Arc B570) — the Arc B570 offers 523.3% better value. The Arc B570 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2016).
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | Arc B570 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $7000 | $219-97% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1335 | $219-84% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.3 | 64.2+523% |
| Codename | GP100 | BMG-G21 |
| Release | October 1 2016 | January 16 2025 |
| Ranking | #178 | #169 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro GP100 and Arc B570
