
Quadro GP100 vs GeForce GTX 980 Ti

Quadro GP100
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro GP100
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro GP100 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro GP100 | GeForce GTX 980 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+166.7%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 980 Ti holds the technical lead. Priced at $100 (vs $1,335), it costs 93% less, resulting in a 1235.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro GP100 | GeForce GTX 980 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1235.1%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,335) | ✅More affordable ($100) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro GP100 and GeForce GTX 980 Ti

Quadro GP100
The Quadro GP100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1304 MHz to 1442 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 235W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,710 points.

GeForce GTX 980 Ti
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 2 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1075 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,711 points. Launch price was $649.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro GP100 scores 13,710 and the GeForce GTX 980 Ti reaches 13,711 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro GP100 is built on Pascal while the GeForce GTX 980 Ti uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Quadro GP100) vs 2,816 (GeForce GTX 980 Ti). Raw compute: 10.34 TFLOPS (Quadro GP100) vs 6.06 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 980 Ti). Boost clocks: 1442 MHz vs 1075 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | GeForce GTX 980 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,710 | 13,711 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+27% | 2816 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.34 TFLOPS+71% | 6.06 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1442 MHz+34% | 1075 MHz |
| ROPs | 96 | 96 |
| TMUs | 224+27% | 176 |
| L1 Cache | 1.3 MB+30% | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | GeForce GTX 980 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro GP100 comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 980 Ti has 6 GB. The Quadro GP100 offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 1024 GB/s (Quadro GP100) vs 336 GB/s (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) — a 204.8% advantage for the Quadro GP100. Bus width: 4096-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Quadro GP100) vs 3 MB (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) — the Quadro GP100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | GeForce GTX 980 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+167% | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 1024 GB/s+205% | 336 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 4096-bit+967% | 384-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (Quadro GP100) vs 12.1 (GeForce GTX 980 Ti). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | GeForce GTX 980 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 4th gen (Quadro GP100) vs NVENC 3.0 (GeForce GTX 980 Ti). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd gen vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8,VP9 (Quadro GP100) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce GTX 980 Ti).
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | GeForce GTX 980 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 4th gen | NVENC 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3rd gen | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro GP100 draws 235W versus the GeForce GTX 980 Ti's 250W — a 6.2% difference. The Quadro GP100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro GP100) vs 600W (GeForce GTX 980 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | GeForce GTX 980 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 235W-6% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-17% | 600W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 58.3+6% | 54.8 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro GP100 launched at $7000 MSRP and currently averages $1335, while the GeForce GTX 980 Ti launched at $649 and now averages $100. The GeForce GTX 980 Ti costs 92.5% less ($1235 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 10.3 (Quadro GP100) vs 137.1 (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) — the GeForce GTX 980 Ti offers 1231.1% better value. The Quadro GP100 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | GeForce GTX 980 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $7000 | $649-91% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1335 | $100-93% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.3 | 137.1+1231% |
| Codename | GP100 | GM200 |
| Release | October 1 2016 | June 2 2015 |
| Ranking | #178 | #179 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















