
Quadro GP100 vs GeForce GTX 1070

Quadro GP100
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro GP100
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro GP100 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (16 GB vs 8 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1070.
| Insight | Quadro GP100 | GeForce GTX 1070 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1070 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 1070 holds the technical lead. Priced at $80 (vs $1,335), it costs 94% less, resulting in a 1544% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro GP100 | GeForce GTX 1070 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1544%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,335) | ✅More affordable ($80) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro GP100 and GeForce GTX 1070

Quadro GP100
The Quadro GP100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1304 MHz to 1442 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 235W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,710 points.

GeForce GTX 1070
The GeForce GTX 1070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 10 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1683 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,507 points. Launch price was $379.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro GP100 scores 13,710 and the GeForce GTX 1070 reaches 13,507 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro GP100 is built on Pascal while the GeForce GTX 1070 uses Pascal, both on a 16 nm process. Shader units: 3,584 (Quadro GP100) vs 1,920 (GeForce GTX 1070). Raw compute: 10.34 TFLOPS (Quadro GP100) vs 6.463 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1070). Boost clocks: 1442 MHz vs 1683 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | GeForce GTX 1070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,710+2% | 13,507 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+87% | 1920 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.34 TFLOPS+60% | 6.463 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1442 MHz | 1683 MHz+17% |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 224+87% | 120 |
| L1 Cache | 1.3 MB+86% | 0.7 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | GeForce GTX 1070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro GP100 comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1070 has 8 GB. The Quadro GP100 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 1024 GB/s (Quadro GP100) vs 256 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1070) — a 300% advantage for the Quadro GP100. Bus width: 4096-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Quadro GP100) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1070) — the Quadro GP100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | GeForce GTX 1070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 1024 GB/s+300% | 256 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 4096-bit+1500% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (Quadro GP100) vs 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1070). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | GeForce GTX 1070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 4th gen (Quadro GP100) vs NVENC 6th gen (GeForce GTX 1070). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd gen vs NVDEC 3rd gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8,VP9 (Quadro GP100) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 1070).
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | GeForce GTX 1070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 4th gen | NVENC 6th gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3rd gen | NVDEC 3rd gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro GP100 draws 235W versus the GeForce GTX 1070's 150W — a 44.2% difference. The GeForce GTX 1070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro GP100) vs 500W (GeForce GTX 1070). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | GeForce GTX 1070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 235W | 150W-36% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 58.3 | 90.0+54% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro GP100 launched at $7000 MSRP and currently averages $1335, while the GeForce GTX 1070 launched at $379 and now averages $80. The GeForce GTX 1070 costs 94% less ($1255 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 10.3 (Quadro GP100) vs 168.8 (GeForce GTX 1070) — the GeForce GTX 1070 offers 1538.8% better value.
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | GeForce GTX 1070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $7000 | $379-95% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1335 | $80-94% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.3 | 168.8+1539% |
| Codename | GP100 | GP104 |
| Release | October 1 2016 | June 10 2016 |
| Ranking | #178 | #185 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















