Quadro M2200 vs Radeon RX 460

NVIDIA

Quadro M2200

2017Core: 695 MHzBoost: 1036 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon RX 460

2016Core: 1090 MHzBoost: 1200 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Quadro M2200 vs Radeon RX 460 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro M2200 vs Radeon RX 460 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro M2200 vs Radeon RX 460: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro M2200

2017

Why buy it

  • 10.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Draws 55W instead of 75W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 354.5% HIGHER MSRP
    $500 MSRPvs$110 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.6 vs 37.3 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $110 MSRP).

Radeon RX 460

2016

Why buy it

  • Costs $390 less on MSRP ($110 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
  • Delivers 333.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 37.3 vs 8.6 G3D/$ ($110 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro M2200 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2016 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 36.4% higher power demand at 75W vs 55W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro M2200 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 10.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 4.8% in PassMark G3D (4,294 vs 4,099), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro M2200 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2017 generation instead of 2016. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon RX 460 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $390 cheaper on MSRP at $110 vs $500, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 333.9% (37.3 vs 8.6), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon RX 460 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro M2200 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro M2200 vs Radeon RX 460 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro M2200

The Quadro M2200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 695 MHz to 1036 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,294 points.

AMD

Radeon RX 460

The Radeon RX 460 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 8 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1090 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,099 points. Launch price was $86.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro M2200 scores 4,294 and the Radeon RX 460 reaches 4,099 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M2200 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon RX 460 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Quadro M2200) vs 896 (Radeon RX 460). Raw compute: 2.122 TFLOPS (Quadro M2200) vs 2.15 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 460). Boost clocks: 1036 MHz vs 1200 MHz.

FeatureQuadro M2200Radeon RX 460
G3D Mark Score
4,294+5%
4,099
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
GCN 4.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
1024+14%
896
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.122 TFLOPS
2.15 TFLOPS+1%
Boost Clock
1036 MHz
1200 MHz+16%
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
64+14%
56
L1 Cache
384 KB+71%
224 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro M2200Radeon RX 460
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro M2200 and 128-bit on the Radeon RX 460.

FeatureQuadro M2200Radeon RX 460
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Quadro M2200) vs 12 (FL 12_0) (Radeon RX 460). Vulkan: 1.4 vs Supported. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

FeatureQuadro M2200Radeon RX 460
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (FL 12_0)
Vulkan
1.4
Supported
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4+33%
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) (Quadro M2200) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 460). Decoder: 2nd Gen NVDEC vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC (Quadro M2200) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (Radeon RX 460).

FeatureQuadro M2200Radeon RX 460
Encoder
5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell)
VCE 3.4
Decoder
2nd Gen NVDEC
UVD 6.3
Codecs
H.264,HEVC
H.264,H.265/HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro M2200 draws 55W versus the Radeon RX 460's 75W — a 30.8% difference. The Quadro M2200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M2200) vs 350W (Radeon RX 460). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

FeatureQuadro M2200Radeon RX 460
TDP
55W-27%
75W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
170mm
Height
111mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
80°C
Perf/Watt
78.1+43%
54.7
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro M2200 came in at $500, while the Radeon RX 460 launched at $110. On MSRP, Radeon RX 460 was 78% cheaper ($390 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 8.6 (Quadro M2200) vs 37.3 (Radeon RX 460) — the Radeon RX 460 offers 333.7% better value. The newer card here is Quadro M2200 (2017 vs 2016).

FeatureQuadro M2200Radeon RX 460
MSRP
$500
$110-78%
Performance per Dollar
8.6
37.3+334%
Codename
GM206
Baffin
Release
January 11 2017
August 8 2016
Ranking
#479
#485

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.