Quadro M2200 vs Radeon RX 460

Quadro M2200

2017Core: 695 MHzBoost: 1036 MHz

Radeon RX 460

2016Core: 1090 MHzBoost: 1200 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Quadro M2200

4,294

+4.8%

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with Max-Q Design

GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU

GeForce RTX 5050

GeForce RTX 2080 Ti

Radeon RX 460

4,099

0.0%

Radeon HD 6970M

Radeon RX 550

Radeon R7 360

Radeon RX 550 (móvel)

Radeon R9 290X / 390X

Radeon RX 5700M

Radeon RX 6650M XT

Radeon RX 6800

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro M2200 is positioned at rank #158 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro M2200

#74

RTX 5000 Ada Generation

MSRP: $4000|Avg: $4095

88%

#75

Radeon Pro Vega II

MSRP: $2199|Avg: $1800

83%

#76

Radeon PRO W7900

MSRP: $3999|Avg: $3500

82%

#143

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

1720%

#158

Quadro M2200

MSRP: $500|Avg: $70

100%

#159

Quadro M4000

MSRP: $791|Avg: $350

98%

#160

FirePro W4100

MSRP: $183|Avg: $183

95%

#166

FirePro W5100

MSRP: $399|Avg: $50

87%

#167

Radeon Pro WX 4170

MSRP: $400|Avg: $120

84%

#168

FirePro W4300

MSRP: $379|Avg: $50

83%

#169

Quadro K2200

MSRP: $500|Avg: $40

83%

#173

Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600

MSRP: $119|Avg: $86

82%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro M2200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 460.

Insight	Quadro M2200	Radeon RX 460
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+4.8%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.8%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon RX 460 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon RX 460 holds the technical lead. Priced at $35 (vs $70), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 90.9% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Quadro M2200	Radeon RX 460
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+90.9%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($70)	✅More affordable ($35)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro M2200 Benchmark Check

Radeon RX 460 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro M2200 and Radeon RX 460

Quadro M2200

The Quadro M2200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 695 MHz to 1036 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,294 points.

Radeon RX 460

The Radeon RX 460 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 8 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1090 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,099 points. Launch price was $86.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro M2200 scores 4,294 and the Radeon RX 460 reaches 4,099 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M2200 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon RX 460 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Quadro M2200) vs 896 (Radeon RX 460). Raw compute: 2.122 TFLOPS (Quadro M2200) vs 2.15 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 460). Boost clocks: 1036 MHz vs 1200 MHz.

Feature	Quadro M2200	Radeon RX 460
G3D Mark Score	4,294+5%	4,099
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	GCN 4.0
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	1024+14%	896
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.122 TFLOPS	2.15 TFLOPS+1%
Boost Clock	1036 MHz	1200 MHz+16%
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	64+14%	56
L1 Cache	384 KB+71%	224 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro M2200	Radeon RX 460
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.

Feature	Quadro M2200	Radeon RX 460
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Quadro M2200) vs 12 (FL 12_0) (Radeon RX 460). Vulkan: 1.4 vs Supported. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

Feature	Quadro M2200	Radeon RX 460
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (FL 12_0)
Vulkan	1.4	Supported
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+33%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) (Quadro M2200) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 460). Decoder: 2nd Gen NVDEC vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC (Quadro M2200) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (Radeon RX 460).

Feature	Quadro M2200	Radeon RX 460
Encoder	5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell)	VCE 3.4
Decoder	2nd Gen NVDEC	UVD 6.3
Codecs	H.264,HEVC	H.264,H.265/HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro M2200 draws 55W versus the Radeon RX 460's 75W — a 30.8% difference. The Quadro M2200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M2200) vs 350W (Radeon RX 460). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

Feature	Quadro M2200	Radeon RX 460
TDP	55W-27%	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Length	—	170mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	80°C	—
Perf/Watt	78.1+43%	54.7

💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro M2200 launched at $500 MSRP and currently averages $70, while the Radeon RX 460 launched at $110 and now averages $35. The Radeon RX 460 costs 50% less ($35 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 61.3 (Quadro M2200) vs 117.1 (Radeon RX 460) — the Radeon RX 460 offers 91% better value. The Quadro M2200 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2016).