
Quadro M2200

Radeon RX 460
Quadro M2200 vs Radeon RX 460 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro M2200 vs Radeon RX 460 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro M2200 vs Radeon RX 460: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro M2200
2017Why buy it
- ✅10.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 75W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌354.5% HIGHER MSRP$500 MSRPvs$110 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.6 vs 37.3 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $110 MSRP).
Radeon RX 460
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $390 less on MSRP ($110 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 333.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 37.3 vs 8.6 G3D/$ ($110 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro M2200 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2016 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌36.4% higher power demand at 75W vs 55W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro M2200 vs Radeon RX 460 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro M2200
The Quadro M2200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 695 MHz to 1036 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,294 points.

Radeon RX 460
The Radeon RX 460 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 8 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1090 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,099 points. Launch price was $86.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro M2200 scores 4,294 and the Radeon RX 460 reaches 4,099 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M2200 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon RX 460 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Quadro M2200) vs 896 (Radeon RX 460). Raw compute: 2.122 TFLOPS (Quadro M2200) vs 2.15 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 460). Boost clocks: 1036 MHz vs 1200 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro M2200 | Radeon RX 460 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,294+5% | 4,099 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024+14% | 896 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.122 TFLOPS | 2.15 TFLOPS+1% |
| Boost Clock | 1036 MHz | 1200 MHz+16% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 64+14% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 384 KB+71% | 224 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro M2200 | Radeon RX 460 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro M2200 and 128-bit on the Radeon RX 460.
| Feature | Quadro M2200 | Radeon RX 460 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Quadro M2200) vs 12 (FL 12_0) (Radeon RX 460). Vulkan: 1.4 vs Supported. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | Quadro M2200 | Radeon RX 460 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (FL 12_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | Supported |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) (Quadro M2200) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 460). Decoder: 2nd Gen NVDEC vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC (Quadro M2200) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (Radeon RX 460).
| Feature | Quadro M2200 | Radeon RX 460 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | 2nd Gen NVDEC | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro M2200 draws 55W versus the Radeon RX 460's 75W — a 30.8% difference. The Quadro M2200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M2200) vs 350W (Radeon RX 460). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | Quadro M2200 | Radeon RX 460 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 55W-27% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | — | 170mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 78.1+43% | 54.7 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro M2200 came in at $500, while the Radeon RX 460 launched at $110. On MSRP, Radeon RX 460 was 78% cheaper ($390 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 8.6 (Quadro M2200) vs 37.3 (Radeon RX 460) — the Radeon RX 460 offers 333.7% better value. The newer card here is Quadro M2200 (2017 vs 2016).
| Feature | Quadro M2200 | Radeon RX 460 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500 | $110-78% |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.6 | 37.3+334% |
| Codename | GM206 | Baffin |
| Release | January 11 2017 | August 8 2016 |
| Ranking | #479 | #485 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














