G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro M6000 24GB vs RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro M6000 24GB vs RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro M6000 24GB

2016

Why buy it

✅17.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($4,999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
❌2016 hardware with 24 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌614.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 35W.

RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile

2024

Why buy it

✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 35W instead of 250W, a 215W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro M6000 24GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro M6000 24GB is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 17.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 4.1% in PassMark G3D (11,625 vs 11,162), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer feature stack, with DLSS 4 Super Resolution (2025) and DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025), while Quadro M6000 24GB is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 5nm process instead of 28nm, 16 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2016. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro M6000 24GB makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro M6000 24GB is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro M6000 24GB vs RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro M6000 24GB

The Quadro M6000 24GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 5 2016. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 988 MHz to 1114 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,625 points. Launch price was $4,999.

RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile

The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 26 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 2025 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,162 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro M6000 24GB scores 11,625 and the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile reaches 11,162 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M6000 24GB is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile uses Ada Lovelace, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs 2,048 (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile). Raw compute: 6.844 TFLOPS (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs 8.294 TFLOPS (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile). Boost clocks: 1114 MHz vs 2025 MHz.

Feature	Quadro M6000 24GB	RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
G3D Mark Score	11,625+4%	11,162
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	Ada Lovelace
Process Node	28 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	3072+50%	2048
Compute (TFLOPS)	6.844 TFLOPS	8.294 TFLOPS+21%
Boost Clock	1114 MHz	2025 MHz+82%
ROPs	96+200%	32
TMUs	256+300%	64
L1 Cache	1.1 MB	2 MB+82%
L2 Cache	3 MB	12 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is support for DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Quadro M6000 24GB does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro M6000 24GB leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	Quadro M6000 24GB	RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	DLSS 4 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	No	Yes (DLSS 4)
Low Latency	Standard	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro M6000 24GB has 24 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile carries 8 GB. Quadro M6000 24GB gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 317 GB/s (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs 128 GB/s (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile) — a 147.7% advantage for the Quadro M6000 24GB. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the Quadro M6000 24GB and 64-bit on the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile. L2 Cache: 3 MB (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs 12 MB (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile) — the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro M6000 24GB	RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
VRAM Capacity	24 GB+200%	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	317 GB/s+148%	128 GB/s
Bus Width	384-bit+500%	64-bit
L2 Cache	3 MB	12 MB+300%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12/1 (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs 12 (12_2) (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Quadro M6000 24GB	RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
DirectX	12/1	12 (12_2)
Vulkan	1.1	1.4+27%
OpenGL	4.5	4.6+2%
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 4.0 (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs H.264,H.265 (HEVC),AV1,VP9 (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile).

Feature	Quadro M6000 24GB	RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
Encoder	NVENC 4.0	8th Gen NVENC
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP6	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC	H.264,H.265 (HEVC),AV1,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro M6000 24GB draws 250W versus the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile's 35W — a 150.9% difference. The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs 500W (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.

Feature	Quadro M6000 24GB	RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
TDP	250W	35W-86%
Recommended PSU	500W	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	267mm	—
Height	112mm	—
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	80°C	80°C
Perf/Watt	46.5	318.9+586%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile (2024 vs 2016).

Feature	Quadro M6000 24GB	RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
MSRP	$4999	—
Codename	GM200	AD107
Release	March 5 2016	February 26 2024
Ranking	#233	#254

Search Quadro M6000 24GB on Amazon

Search RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.