
Quadro P1000
Popular choices:

Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro P1000
2017Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Draws 40W instead of 300W, a 260W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
2017Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌650% higher power demand at 300W vs 40W.
Quadro P1000
2017Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
2017Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Draws 40W instead of 300W, a 260W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌650% higher power demand at 300W vs 40W.
Quick Answers
So, is Quadro P1000 better than Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro P1000 | Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 32 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 23 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 34 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 21 FPS | 102 FPS |
| high | 13 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 9 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 16 FPS | 55 FPS |
| medium | 11 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 7 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 5 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro P1000 | Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 198 FPS |
| medium | 53 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 19 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 13 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 10 FPS | 70 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 7 FPS | 60 FPS |
| medium | 5 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 40 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro P1000 | Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 202 FPS | 198 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 101 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 50 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro P1000 | Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 202 FPS | 198 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 100 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 63 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 48 FPS | 50 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P1000 and Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU

Quadro P1000
Quadro P1000
The Quadro P1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1493 MHz to 1519 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,495 points. Launch price was $375.

Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
The Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 27 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1400 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 4096 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,403 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P1000 scores 4,495 and the Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU reaches 4,403 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P1000 is built on Pascal while the Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU uses GCN 5.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 640 (Quadro P1000) vs 4,096 (Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU). Raw compute: 1.555 TFLOPS (Quadro P1000) vs 12.29 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU). Boost clocks: 1519 MHz vs 1500 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P1000 | Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,495+2% | 4,403 |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 4096 ×2+540% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.555 TFLOPS | 12.29 TFLOPS ×2+690% |
| Boost Clock | 1519 MHz+1% | 1500 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 64 ×2+300% |
| TMUs | 32 | 256 ×2+700% |
| L1 Cache | 0.19 MB | 1 MB+426% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 4 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P1000 | Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P1000 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU has 2 GB. The Quadro P1000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Quadro P1000) vs 4 MB (Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU) — the Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P1000 | Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 4 MB+300% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P1000 draws 40W versus the Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU's 300W — a 152.9% difference. The Quadro P1000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P1000) vs 350W (Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro P1000 | Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 40W-87% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 145mm | — |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 112.4+665% | 14.7 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













