Quadro P1000 vs Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU

NVIDIA

Quadro P1000

2017Core: 1493 MHzBoost: 1519 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU

2017Core: 1400 MHzBoost: 1500 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Quadro P1000

2017

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
  • Draws 40W instead of 300W, a 260W reduction.
  • More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU

2017

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • 650% higher power demand at 300W vs 40W.

Quick Answers

So, is Quadro P1000 better than Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 4,495 vs 4,403 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Quadro P1000 is the overall package: you are getting no meaningful modern upscaling stack, plus much lower power draw (40W vs 300W).
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro P1000 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more VRAM at 4 GB instead of 2 GB and the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Quadro P1000 can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around Unknown MSRP. Quadro P1000 is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Quadro P1000 is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 2.1% higher G3D Mark. Moving to an unclear MSRP gets you lower power draw (40W vs 300W), and no meaningful modern upscaling stack.
Is Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Yes. Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU is still a strong gaming card in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. Price is really the swing factor here. If you find it at or below an unclear MSRP, it remains a very sensible buy. Quadro P1000 is still the safer recommendation for most fresh builds because it offers a cleaner overall package with no meaningful modern upscaling stack.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetQuadro P1000Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
1080p
low47 FPS139 FPS
medium32 FPS129 FPS
high23 FPS106 FPS
ultra16 FPS81 FPS
1440p
low34 FPS118 FPS
medium21 FPS102 FPS
high13 FPS82 FPS
ultra9 FPS64 FPS
4K
low16 FPS55 FPS
medium11 FPS48 FPS
high7 FPS38 FPS
ultra5 FPS34 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetQuadro P1000Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
1080p
low86 FPS198 FPS
medium53 FPS159 FPS
high39 FPS132 FPS
ultra24 FPS99 FPS
1440p
low26 FPS137 FPS
medium19 FPS111 FPS
high13 FPS92 FPS
ultra10 FPS70 FPS
4K
low7 FPS60 FPS
medium5 FPS50 FPS
high4 FPS48 FPS
ultra3 FPS40 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetQuadro P1000Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
1080p
low202 FPS198 FPS
medium162 FPS159 FPS
high135 FPS132 FPS
ultra101 FPS99 FPS
1440p
low152 FPS149 FPS
medium121 FPS119 FPS
high101 FPS99 FPS
ultra76 FPS74 FPS
4K
low101 FPS99 FPS
medium81 FPS79 FPS
high67 FPS66 FPS
ultra51 FPS50 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetQuadro P1000Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
1080p
low202 FPS198 FPS
medium162 FPS159 FPS
high135 FPS132 FPS
ultra101 FPS99 FPS
1440p
low152 FPS149 FPS
medium121 FPS119 FPS
high101 FPS99 FPS
ultra76 FPS74 FPS
4K
low100 FPS99 FPS
medium73 FPS79 FPS
high63 FPS66 FPS
ultra48 FPS50 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P1000 and Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU

NVIDIA

Quadro P1000

The Quadro P1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1493 MHz to 1519 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,495 points. Launch price was $375.

AMD

Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU

The Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 27 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1400 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 4096 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,403 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro P1000 scores 4,495 and the Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU reaches 4,403 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P1000 is built on Pascal while the Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU uses GCN 5.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 640 (Quadro P1000) vs 4,096 (Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU). Raw compute: 1.555 TFLOPS (Quadro P1000) vs 12.29 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU). Boost clocks: 1519 MHz vs 1500 MHz.

FeatureQuadro P1000Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
G3D Mark Score
4,495+2%
4,403
Architecture
Pascal
GCN 5.0
Process Node
14 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
640
4096 ×2+540%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.555 TFLOPS
12.29 TFLOPS ×2+690%
Boost Clock
1519 MHz+1%
1500 MHz
ROPs
16
64 ×2+300%
TMUs
32
256 ×2+700%
L1 Cache
0.19 MB
1 MB+426%
L2 Cache
1 MB
4 MB+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro P1000Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro P1000 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU has 2 GB. The Quadro P1000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Quadro P1000) vs 4 MB (Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU) — the Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro P1000Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
4 MB+300%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P1000 draws 40W versus the Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU's 300W — a 152.9% difference. The Quadro P1000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P1000) vs 350W (Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureQuadro P1000Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
TDP
40W-87%
300W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
145mm
Height
69mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
70°C
Perf/Watt
112.4+665%
14.7