Quadro P2000 (móvel) vs Radeon Pro WX 5100

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Quadro P2000 (móvel)

2019

Why buy it

✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon Pro WX 5100: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon Pro WX 5100 is already obsolete for modern gaming.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro WX 5100 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌
0.2% HIGHER MSRP
$500 MSRPvs$499 MSRP

Radeon Pro WX 5100

2016

Why buy it

✅17.1% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
✅97.6% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

Quadro P2000 (móvel)

2019

Radeon Pro WX 5100

2016

Why buy it

✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon Pro WX 5100: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon Pro WX 5100 is already obsolete for modern gaming.

Why buy it

✅17.1% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
✅97.6% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro WX 5100 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌
0.2% HIGHER MSRP
$500 MSRPvs$499 MSRP

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon Pro WX 5100 better than Quadro P2000 (móvel)?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. Radeon Pro WX 5100 averages 17.1% more FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 5,353 vs 5,500 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Radeon Pro WX 5100 is the overall package: you are getting FSR upscaling.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro P2000 (móvel) is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2019 generation instead of 2016 and the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon Pro WX 5100 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. Radeon Pro WX 5100 is about $1 cheaper on MSRP at $499 MSRP versus $500 MSRP, and you are getting 17.1% more estimated average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data and 2.7% higher G3D Mark. It only holds a slight 3% edge in G3D-per-dollar, so the value lead is real but narrow. Quadro P2000 (móvel) is the newer 2019 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does Quadro P2000 (móvel) make more sense than Radeon Pro WX 5100?

Yes. Quadro P2000 (móvel) is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, future-proofing, and staying closer to $500 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon Pro WX 5100. The trade-off is that Radeon Pro WX 5100 currently gives you 2.7% higher G3D Mark and 17.1% more estimated average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data. It only holds a slight 3% edge in G3D-per-dollar, so the value lead is real but narrow.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro P2000 (móvel) Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro WX 5100 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Quadro P2000 (móvel)	Radeon Pro WX 5100
1080p
low	88 FPS	101 FPS
medium	79 FPS	85 FPS
high	66 FPS	71 FPS
ultra	54 FPS	47 FPS
1440p
low	82 FPS	87 FPS
medium	71 FPS	73 FPS
high	55 FPS	53 FPS
ultra	45 FPS	35 FPS
4K
low	38 FPS	35 FPS
medium	35 FPS	32 FPS
high	24 FPS	19 FPS
ultra	21 FPS	16 FPS

Open Quadro P2000 (móvel)Open Radeon Pro WX 5100

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Quadro P2000 (móvel)	Radeon Pro WX 5100
1080p
low	165 FPS	111 FPS
medium	134 FPS	85 FPS
high	103 FPS	63 FPS
ultra	72 FPS	45 FPS
1440p
low	113 FPS	79 FPS
medium	89 FPS	58 FPS
high	69 FPS	45 FPS
ultra	54 FPS	33 FPS
4K
low	57 FPS	41 FPS
medium	45 FPS	32 FPS
high	37 FPS	25 FPS
ultra	27 FPS	18 FPS

Open Quadro P2000 (móvel)Open Radeon Pro WX 5100

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Quadro P2000 (móvel)	Radeon Pro WX 5100
1080p
low	241 FPS	248 FPS
medium	193 FPS	198 FPS
high	161 FPS	165 FPS
ultra	120 FPS	124 FPS
1440p
low	181 FPS	186 FPS
medium	145 FPS	148 FPS
high	120 FPS	124 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	93 FPS
4K
low	120 FPS	124 FPS
medium	96 FPS	99 FPS
high	80 FPS	82 FPS
ultra	60 FPS	62 FPS

Open Quadro P2000 (móvel)Open Radeon Pro WX 5100

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Quadro P2000 (móvel)	Radeon Pro WX 5100
1080p
low	226 FPS	225 FPS
medium	177 FPS	193 FPS
high	150 FPS	157 FPS
ultra	120 FPS	124 FPS
1440p
low	174 FPS	174 FPS
medium	135 FPS	148 FPS
high	109 FPS	119 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	93 FPS
4K
low	84 FPS	97 FPS
medium	63 FPS	77 FPS
high	52 FPS	61 FPS
ultra	41 FPS	48 FPS

Open Quadro P2000 (móvel)Open Radeon Pro WX 5100

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P2000 (móvel) and Radeon Pro WX 5100

Quadro P2000 (móvel)

The Quadro P2000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 15 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1291 MHz to 1291 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,353 points.

Radeon Pro WX 5100

The Radeon Pro WX 5100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 18 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 713 MHz to 1086 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points. Launch price was $499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro P2000 (móvel) scores 5,353 and the Radeon Pro WX 5100 reaches 5,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P2000 (móvel) is built on Pascal while the Radeon Pro WX 5100 uses GCN 4.0, both on 16 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,152 (Quadro P2000 (móvel)) vs 1,792 (Radeon Pro WX 5100). Raw compute: 2.974 TFLOPS (Quadro P2000 (móvel)) vs 3.892 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 5100). Boost clocks: 1291 MHz vs 1086 MHz.

Feature	Quadro P2000 (móvel)	Radeon Pro WX 5100
G3D Mark Score	5,353	5,500+3%
Architecture	Pascal	GCN 4.0
Process Node	16 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	1152	1792+56%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.974 TFLOPS	3.892 TFLOPS+31%
Boost Clock	1291 MHz+19%	1086 MHz
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	72	112+56%
L1 Cache	432 KB	448 KB+4%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB	2 MB+60%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro P2000 (móvel)	Radeon Pro WX 5100
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro P2000 (móvel) comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 5100 has 8 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 5100 offers 97.6% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1.25 MB (Quadro P2000 (móvel)) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro WX 5100) — the Radeon Pro WX 5100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro P2000 (móvel)	Radeon Pro WX 5100
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	7.906 GB+98%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	1.25 MB	2 MB+60%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P2000 (móvel) draws 75W versus the Radeon Pro WX 5100's 75W — a 0% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 5100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P2000 (móvel)) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 5100). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Quadro P2000 (móvel)	Radeon Pro WX 5100
TDP	75W	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	—	173mm
Height	—	69mm
Slots	—	1
Temp (Load)	—	82°C
Perf/Watt	71.4	73.3+3%

💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro P2000 (móvel) launched at $500 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro WX 5100 launched at $499. The Radeon Pro WX 5100 costs 0.2% less ($1 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 10.7 (Quadro P2000 (móvel)) vs 11.0 (Radeon Pro WX 5100) — the Radeon Pro WX 5100 offers 2.8% better value. The Quadro P2000 (móvel) is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2016).