
Radeon 630 vs Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U

Radeon 630
Popular choices:

Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon 630 is positioned at rank #292 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 630
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon 630 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U.
| Insight | Radeon 630 | Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.9%) |
| Longevity | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) (14nm) | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon 630 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $50 versus $250 for the Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U, it costs 80% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 409.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon 630 | Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+409.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($50) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($250) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 630 and Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U

Radeon 630
The Radeon 630 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,575 points.

Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U
The Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 28 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1327 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,546 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 630 scores 1,575 and the Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U reaches 1,546 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 630 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U uses RDNA 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon 630) vs 1,408 (Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U). Raw compute: 1.247 TFLOPS (Radeon 630) vs 4.632 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U). Boost clocks: 1218 MHz vs 1645 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon 630 | Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,575+2% | 1,546 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 1408+175% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.247 TFLOPS | 4.632 TFLOPS+271% |
| Boost Clock | 1218 MHz | 1645 MHz+35% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 32 | 88+175% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1.5 MB+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 630 | Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon 630) vs 1.5 MB (Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U) — the Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon 630 | Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1.5 MB+200% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 630 draws 50W versus the Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U's 100W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon 630 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 630) vs 350W (Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | Radeon 630 | Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-50% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Perf/Watt | 31.5+103% | 15.5 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 630 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U launched at $250 and now averages $250. The Radeon 630 costs 80% less ($200 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 31.5 (Radeon 630) vs 6.2 (Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U) — the Radeon 630 offers 408.1% better value. The Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon 630 | Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-60% | $250 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50-80% | $250 |
| Performance per Dollar | 31.5+408% | 6.2 |
| Codename | Polaris 23 | Navi 14 |
| Release | May 13 2019 | May 28 2020 |
| Ranking | #757 | #336 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.

















