G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon HD 6750 vs Radeon R7 M260X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon HD 6750 vs Radeon R7 M260X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon HD 6750

2011

Why buy it

✅6.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $30 less on MSRP ($109 MSRP vs $139 MSRP).
✅Delivers 31.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.6 vs 7.3 G3D/$ ($109 MSRP vs $139 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2011 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon R7 M260X

2015

Why buy it

✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 1 GB).
✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 6750 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
27.5% HIGHER MSRP
$139 MSRPvs$109 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.3 vs 9.6 G3D/$ ($139 MSRP vs $109 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 6750 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 6.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 3.3% in PassMark G3D (1,046 vs 1,013), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon HD 6750 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 6750 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $30 cheaper on MSRP at $109 vs $139, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 31.7% (9.6 vs 7.3), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Radeon HD 6750 vs Radeon R7 M260X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon HD 6750

The Radeon HD 6750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 21 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The boost clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 720 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 86W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,046 points. Launch price was $49.99.

Radeon R7 M260X

The Radeon R7 M260X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 6 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 620 MHz to 715 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,013 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 6750 scores 1,046 and the Radeon R7 M260X reaches 1,013 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 6750 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon R7 M260X uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 720 (Radeon HD 6750) vs 384 (Radeon R7 M260X). Raw compute: 1.008 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6750) vs 0.5491 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M260X). Boost clocks: 900 MHz vs 715 MHz.

Feature	Radeon HD 6750	Radeon R7 M260X
G3D Mark Score	1,046+3%	1,013
Architecture	TeraScale 2	GCN 1.0
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	720+88%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.008 TFLOPS+84%	0.5491 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	900 MHz+26%	715 MHz
ROPs	16+100%	8
TMUs	36+50%	24
L1 Cache	72 KB	96 KB+33%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon HD 6750	Radeon R7 M260X
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 6750 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 M260X carries 4 GB. Radeon R7 M260X gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6750 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 M260X.

Feature	Radeon HD 6750	Radeon R7 M260X
VRAM Capacity	1 GB	4 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.2 (11_0) (Radeon HD 6750) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon R7 M260X). Vulkan: N/A vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.

Feature	Radeon HD 6750	Radeon R7 M260X
DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 (11_1)+7%
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
OpenGL	4.4+2%	4.3
Max Displays	3+50%	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (Radeon HD 6750) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R7 M260X). Decoder: UVD 2.2 vs UVD 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon HD 6750) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MVC (Radeon R7 M260X).

Feature	Radeon HD 6750	Radeon R7 M260X
Encoder	None	VCE 1.0
Decoder	UVD 2.2	UVD 3.0
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 6750 draws 86W versus the Radeon R7 M260X's 75W — a 13.7% difference. The Radeon R7 M260X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (Radeon HD 6750) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M260X). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 170mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 85.

Feature	Radeon HD 6750	Radeon R7 M260X
TDP	86W	75W-13%
Recommended PSU	450W	350W-22%
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	Mobile
Length	170mm	0mm
Height	111mm	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	75-12%	85
Perf/Watt	12.2	13.5+11%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon HD 6750 came in at $109, while the Radeon R7 M260X launched at $139. On MSRP, Radeon HD 6750 was 21.6% cheaper ($30 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.6 (Radeon HD 6750) vs 7.3 (Radeon R7 M260X) — the Radeon HD 6750 offers 31.5% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 M260X (2015 vs 2011).

Feature	Radeon HD 6750	Radeon R7 M260X
MSRP	$109-22%	$139
Performance per Dollar	9.6+32%	7.3
Codename	Juniper	Opal
Release	January 21 2011	December 6 2015
Ranking	#872	#878

Search Radeon HD 6750 on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 M260X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.