G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon HD 8770 vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon HD 8770 vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon HD 8770

2013

Why buy it

✅+223.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $19 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
✅Delivers 264.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.4 vs 4.8 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Draws 50W instead of 300W, a 250W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌23900% longer card at 240mm vs 1mm.

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700

2025

Why buy it

✅23.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Measures 1mm instead of 240mm, a 239mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (806 vs 2,607).
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌
12.7% HIGHER MSRP
$169 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.8 vs 17.4 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
❌500% higher power demand at 300W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 23.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon HD 8770 instead at 2,607 vs 806, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 4nm process instead of 28nm, 64 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2013. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 8770 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $19 cheaper on MSRP at $150 vs $169, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 264.4% (17.4 vs 4.8), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 8770 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon HD 8770 vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon HD 8770

The Radeon HD 8770 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 775 MHz to 825 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,607 points.

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700

The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the Bristol Ridge architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 806 points. Launch price was $1,299.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon HD 8770 scores 2,607 versus the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700's 806 — the Radeon HD 8770 leads by 223.4%. The Radeon HD 8770 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 uses Bristol Ridge, both on 28 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 384 (Radeon HD 8770) vs 4,096 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700). Raw compute: 0.6336 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8770) vs 47.84 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700). Boost clocks: 825 MHz vs 2920 MHz.

Feature	Radeon HD 8770	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700
G3D Mark Score	2,607+223%	806
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Bristol Ridge
Process Node	28 nm	4 nm
Shading Units	384	4096+967%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6336 TFLOPS	47.84 TFLOPS+7451%
Boost Clock	825 MHz	2920 MHz+254%
ROPs	8	128+1500%
TMUs	24	256+967%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	8 MB+3100%
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon HD 8770	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 8770 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 carries 512 MB. Radeon HD 8770 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon HD 8770 and System on the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 8770) vs 8 MB (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700) — the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon HD 8770	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700
VRAM Capacity	2 GB+300%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	96 GB/s	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	System
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	8 MB+3100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_0 (Radeon HD 8770) vs 12 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.

Feature	Radeon HD 8770	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700
DirectX	12_0	12
Max Displays	3	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon HD 8770) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs UVD 6.0.

Feature	Radeon HD 8770	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700
Encoder	VCE 2.0	VCE 3.0
Decoder	UVD 4.0	UVD 6.0

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 8770 draws 50W versus the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700's 300W — a 142.9% difference. The Radeon HD 8770 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 8770) vs 350W (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.

Feature	Radeon HD 8770	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700
TDP	50W-83%	300W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	240mm	1mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Perf/Watt	52.1+1830%	2.7

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon HD 8770 came in at $150, while the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 launched at $169. On MSRP, Radeon HD 8770 was 11.2% cheaper ($19 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 17.4 (Radeon HD 8770) vs 4.8 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700) — the Radeon HD 8770 offers 262.5% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 (2025 vs 2013).

Feature	Radeon HD 8770	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700
MSRP	$150-11%	$169
Performance per Dollar	17.4+262%	4.8
Codename	Mars	Navi 48
Release	April 1 2013	July 23 2025
Ranking	#844	#23

Search Radeon HD 8770 on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.