
Radeon Pro 5300M vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)

Radeon Pro 5300M
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon Pro 5300M is positioned at rank 18 and the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel) is on rank 180, so the Radeon Pro 5300M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro 5300M
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Pro 5300M uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon Pro 5300M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel) lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro 5300M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel).
| Insight | Radeon Pro 5300M | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon Pro 5300M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 5300M and GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)

Radeon Pro 5300M
The Radeon Pro 5300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1250 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,853 points.

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1493 MHz to 1620 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,800 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 5300M scores 5,853 and the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel) reaches 5,800 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 5300M is built on RDNA 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel) uses Pascal, both on 7 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon Pro 5300M) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)). Raw compute: 3.2 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5300M) vs 2.488 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)). Boost clocks: 1250 MHz vs 1620 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300M | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,853 | 5,800 |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280+67% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.2 TFLOPS+29% | 2.488 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1250 MHz | 1620 MHz+30% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 80+67% | 48 |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300M | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon Pro 5300M) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)) — the Radeon Pro 5300M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300M | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5300M) vs 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300M | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5300M) vs NVENC (6th Gen) (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs NVDEC (3rd Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (Radeon Pro 5300M) vs H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300M | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | NVENC (6th Gen) |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | NVDEC (3rd Gen) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 | H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 5300M draws 85W versus the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)'s 75W — a 12.5% difference. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 5300M) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300M | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 85W | 75W-12% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 68.9 | 77.3+12% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro 5300M is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2017).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300M | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $65 |
| Codename | Navi 14 | GP107 |
| Release | November 13 2019 | January 3 2017 |
| Ranking | #403 | #405 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















