
Radeon Pro 5300M
Popular choices:

GeForce MX570
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon Pro 5300M is positioned at rank 18 and the GeForce MX570 is on rank 117, so the Radeon Pro 5300M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro 5300M
Performance Per Dollar GeForce MX570
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro 5300M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce MX570.
| Insight | Radeon Pro 5300M | GeForce MX570 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) | Ampere (2020−2025) (8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon Pro 5300M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 5300M and GeForce MX570

Radeon Pro 5300M
The Radeon Pro 5300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1250 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,853 points.

GeForce MX570
The GeForce MX570 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,738 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 5300M scores 5,853 and the GeForce MX570 reaches 5,738 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 5300M is built on RDNA 1.0 while the GeForce MX570 uses Ampere, both on 7 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon Pro 5300M) vs 2,048 (GeForce MX570). Raw compute: 3.2 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5300M) vs 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce MX570). Boost clocks: 1250 MHz vs 1155 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300M | GeForce MX570 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,853+2% | 5,738 |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 2048+60% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.2 TFLOPS | 4.731 TFLOPS+48% |
| Boost Clock | 1250 MHz+8% | 1155 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 40+25% |
| TMUs | 80+25% | 64 |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300M | GeForce MX570 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300M | GeForce MX570 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 5300M draws 85W versus the GeForce MX570's 25W — a 109.1% difference. The GeForce MX570 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 5300M) vs 350W (GeForce MX570). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300M | GeForce MX570 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 85W | 25W-71% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 68.9 | 229.5+233% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce MX570 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300M | GeForce MX570 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $150 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $120 |
| Codename | Navi 14 | GA107 |
| Release | November 13 2019 | Maio 2022 |
| Ranking | #403 | #407 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.

















