
Radeon Pro 5300M
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 970M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon Pro 5300M is positioned at rank 18 and the GeForce GTX 970M is on rank 27, so the Radeon Pro 5300M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro 5300M
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 970M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Pro 5300M uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon Pro 5300M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 970M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro 5300M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.6% higher G3D Mark score and 33.3% more VRAM (4 GB vs 3 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 970M.
| Insight | Radeon Pro 5300M | GeForce GTX 970M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.6%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+33.3%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon Pro 5300M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 5300M and GeForce GTX 970M

Radeon Pro 5300M
The Radeon Pro 5300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1250 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,853 points.

GeForce GTX 970M
The GeForce GTX 970M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 7 2014. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 924 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 81W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,705 points. Launch price was $2,560.89.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 5300M scores 5,853 and the GeForce GTX 970M reaches 5,705 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 5300M is built on RDNA 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 970M uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 7 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon Pro 5300M) vs 1,280 (GeForce GTX 970M). Raw compute: 3.2 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5300M) vs 2.657 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 970M). Boost clocks: 1250 MHz vs 1038 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300M | GeForce GTX 970M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,853+3% | 5,705 |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 1280 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.2 TFLOPS+20% | 2.657 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1250 MHz+20% | 1038 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 80 | 80 |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300M | GeForce GTX 970M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro 5300M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 970M has 3 GB. The Radeon Pro 5300M offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon Pro 5300M) vs 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 970M) — the Radeon Pro 5300M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300M | GeForce GTX 970M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+33% | 3 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5300M) vs 12_1 (GeForce GTX 970M). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300M | GeForce GTX 970M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12_1 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5300M) vs NVENC 5th Gen (GeForce GTX 970M). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs NVDEC 2nd Gen.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300M | GeForce GTX 970M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | NVENC 5th Gen |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | NVDEC 2nd Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 5300M draws 85W versus the GeForce GTX 970M's 81W — a 4.8% difference. The GeForce GTX 970M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 5300M) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 970M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300M | GeForce GTX 970M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 85W | 81W-5% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 68.9 | 70.4+2% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.

















