
Radeon Pro 5300M vs Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire

Radeon Pro 5300M
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon Pro 5300M is positioned at rank 18 and the Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire is on rank 123, so the Radeon Pro 5300M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro 5300M
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Pro 5300M is significantly newer (2019 vs 2011). The Radeon Pro 5300M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro 5300M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire.
| Insight | Radeon Pro 5300M | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.8%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Terascale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon Pro 5300M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 5300M and Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire

Radeon Pro 5300M
The Radeon Pro 5300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1250 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,853 points.

Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
The Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2011. It features the Terascale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,637 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 5300M scores 5,853 and the Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire reaches 5,637 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 5300M is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire uses Terascale 2, both on 7 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon Pro 5300M) vs 1,920 (Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300M | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,853+4% | 5,637 |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Terascale 2 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 1920+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300M | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit x2.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300M | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit x2+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5300M) vs 11_0 (Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300M | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1+10% | 11_0 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5300M) vs UVD 3 (Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs UVD 3.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300M | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | UVD 3 |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | UVD 3 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 5300M draws 85W versus the Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire's 50W — a 51.9% difference. The Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 5300M) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300M | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 85W | 50W-41% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 68.9 | 112.7+64% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro 5300M is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2011).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300M | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $150 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $150 |
| Codename | Navi 14 | Blackcomb XT |
| Release | November 13 2019 | January 6 2011 |
| Ranking | #403 | #537 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















