Radeon Pro 5300M vs GRID P40-4Q
Radeon Pro 5300M
Popular choices:
GRID P40-4Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon Pro 5300M is positioned at rank 18 and the GRID P40-4Q is on rank 294, so the Radeon Pro 5300M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro 5300M
Performance Per Dollar GRID P40-4Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Pro 5300M is significantly newer (2019 vs 2013). The Radeon Pro 5300M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GRID P40-4Q lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID P40-4Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro 5300M.
| Insight | Radeon Pro 5300M | GRID P40-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.2%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GRID P40-4Q remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 5300M and GRID P40-4Q
Radeon Pro 5300M
The Radeon Pro 5300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1250 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,853 points.
GRID P40-4Q
The GRID P40-4Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,926 points. Launch price was $469.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 5300M scores 5,853 and the GRID P40-4Q reaches 5,926 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 5300M is built on RDNA 1.0 while the GRID P40-4Q uses Kepler, both on 7 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon Pro 5300M) vs 1,536 (GRID P40-4Q). Raw compute: 3.2 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5300M) vs 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID P40-4Q).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300M | GRID P40-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,853 | 5,926+1% |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 1536+20% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.2 TFLOPS+40% | 2.289 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 80 | 128+60% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300M | GRID P40-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon Pro 5300M) vs 0.5 MB (GRID P40-4Q) — the Radeon Pro 5300M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300M | GRID P40-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5300M) vs 12_1 (GRID P40-4Q). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300M | GRID P40-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12_1 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 5300M draws 85W versus the GRID P40-4Q's 225W — a 90.3% difference. The Radeon Pro 5300M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 5300M) vs 350W (GRID P40-4Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300M | GRID P40-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 85W-62% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 68.9+162% | 26.3 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro 5300M is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300M | GRID P40-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $3000 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $150 |
| Codename | Navi 14 | GK104 |
| Release | November 13 2019 | June 28 2013 |
| Ranking | #403 | #628 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Pro 5300M and GRID P40-4Q
