Radeon PRO W6400 vs GeForce GTX TITAN Z
Radeon PRO W6400
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon PRO W6400 is positioned at rank #33 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Great cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO W6400
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon PRO W6400 is significantly newer (2022 vs 2014). The Radeon PRO W6400 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX TITAN Z lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX TITAN Z is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.5% higher G3D Mark score and 200% more VRAM (12 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon PRO W6400.
| Insight | Radeon PRO W6400 | GeForce GTX TITAN Z |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.5%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (6nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (4 GB) | ✅ More VRAM (+200%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon PRO W6400 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $200 versus $400 for the GeForce GTX TITAN Z, it costs 50% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 91.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon PRO W6400 | GeForce GTX TITAN Z |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+91.3%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($200) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($400) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO W6400 and GeForce GTX TITAN Z
Radeon PRO W6400
The Radeon PRO W6400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 19 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2331 MHz to 2331 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,428 points.
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
The GeForce GTX TITAN Z is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 28 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 705 MHz to 876 MHz. It has 5760 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 375W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,811 points. Launch price was $2,999.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon PRO W6400 scores 8,428 and the GeForce GTX TITAN Z reaches 8,811 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W6400 is built on RDNA 2.0 while the GeForce GTX TITAN Z uses Kepler, both on 6 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 768 (Radeon PRO W6400) vs 5,760 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z). Raw compute: 3.58 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6400) vs 5.046 TFLOPS ×2 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z). Boost clocks: 2331 MHz vs 876 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6400 | GeForce GTX TITAN Z |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,428 | 8,811+5% |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 5760 ×2+650% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.58 TFLOPS | 5.046 TFLOPS ×2+41% |
| Boost Clock | 2331 MHz+166% | 876 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 48 ×2+50% |
| TMUs | 48 | 240 ×2+400% |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB+7% | 240 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1.5 MB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6400 | GeForce GTX TITAN Z |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon PRO W6400 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX TITAN Z has 12 GB. The GeForce GTX TITAN Z offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 384-bit x2. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon PRO W6400) vs 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) — the GeForce GTX TITAN Z has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6400 | GeForce GTX TITAN Z |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 12 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 384-bit x2+50% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1.5 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6400) vs 12 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.0. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6400 | GeForce GTX TITAN Z |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.2+20% | 1.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6400) vs NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX TITAN Z). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs NVDEC 1st gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Radeon PRO W6400) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6400 | GeForce GTX TITAN Z |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 3.0 | NVENC 1st gen |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 | NVDEC 1st gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO W6400 draws 50W versus the GeForce GTX TITAN Z's 375W — a 152.9% difference. The Radeon PRO W6400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon PRO W6400) vs 700W (GeForce GTX TITAN Z). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 168mm vs 267mm, occupying 1 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6400 | GeForce GTX TITAN Z |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-87% | 375W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-29% | 700W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 168mm | 267mm |
| Height | 69mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-67% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-13% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 168.6+617% | 23.5 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon PRO W6400 launched at $229 MSRP and currently averages $200, while the GeForce GTX TITAN Z launched at $2999 and now averages $400. The Radeon PRO W6400 costs 50% less ($200 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 42.1 (Radeon PRO W6400) vs 22.0 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) — the Radeon PRO W6400 offers 91.4% better value. The Radeon PRO W6400 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6400 | GeForce GTX TITAN Z |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $229-92% | $2999 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $200-50% | $400 |
| Performance per Dollar | 42.1+91% | 22.0 |
| Codename | Navi 24 | GK110B |
| Release | January 19 2022 | May 28 2014 |
| Ranking | #308 | #300 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon PRO W6400 and GeForce GTX TITAN Z
