Radeon PRO W6400
VS
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

Radeon PRO W6400 vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

AMD

Radeon PRO W6400

2022Core: 2331 MHzBoost: 2331 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

2023Core: 2310 MHzBoost: 2610 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon PRO W6400 is positioned at rank #33 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Great cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO W6400

#9
Intel Arc Pro B50
MSRP: $349|Avg: $349
95%
#11
Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
MSRP: $900|Avg: $300
90%
#16
Radeon PRO W7500
MSRP: $429|Avg: $401
84%
#18
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
401%
#18
Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $340
83%
#19
RTX A2000 12GB
MSRP: $449|Avg: $380
83%
#20
Radeon Pro Vega 56
MSRP: $399|Avg: $60
82%
#21
RTX A2000
MSRP: $450|Avg: $320
81%
#33
Radeon PRO W6400
MSRP: $229|Avg: $200
100%
#36
T600
MSRP: $200|Avg: $180
87%
#43
P106-100
MSRP: $224|Avg: $30
80%
#48
Quadro K3100M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $400
78%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

#27
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $380
111%
#28
Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB
MSRP: $269|Avg: $318
110%
#29
Radeon RX 6700 XT
MSRP: $479|Avg: $230
110%
#30
GeForce RTX 3060
MSRP: $329|Avg: $289
110%
#31
Radeon RX 7400
MSRP: $199|Avg: $199
109%
#32
Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB
MSRP: $349|Avg: $349
109%
#33
Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB
MSRP: $349|Avg: $349
107%
#34
Radeon RX 5300
MSRP: $129|Avg: $50
105%
#35
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
MSRP: $150|Avg: $77
104%
#36
Radeon RX 6400
MSRP: $159|Avg: $139
104%
#37
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
MSRP: $599|Avg: $330
104%
#38
Arc A750
MSRP: $289|Avg: $229
103%
#39
Radeon RX 6800
MSRP: $579|Avg: $370
102%
#40
GeForce RTX 3060 8GB
MSRP: $329|Avg: $280
101%
#41
Radeon RX 6750 XT
MSRP: $549|Avg: $320
101%
#42
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
MSRP: $799|Avg: $590
100%
#43
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB
MSRP: $429|Avg: $429
99%
#44
GeForce RTX 5070
MSRP: $549|Avg: $550
98%
#45
Radeon RX 7600 XT
MSRP: $329|Avg: $330
98%
#46
GeForce RTX 2050
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
96%
#47
GeForce RTX 3080
MSRP: $699|Avg: $400
96%
#48
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
MSRP: $499|Avg: $449
95%
#49
Radeon RX 7900 GRE
MSRP: $549|Avg: $540
94%
#50
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
MSRP: $599|Avg: $600
93%
#51
Radeon RX 7800 XT
MSRP: $499|Avg: $490
92%
#52
GeForce RTX 3060 12GB
MSRP: $329|Avg: $340
92%
#53
GeForce RTX 4070
MSRP: $599|Avg: $550
91%
#54
Radeon RX 7650 GRE
MSRP: $279|Avg: $380
91%
#55
GeForce RTX 2060 12GB
MSRP: $470|Avg: $120
90%
#56
Arc A770
MSRP: $349|Avg: $280
89%
#57
Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB
MSRP: $289|Avg: $423
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 274.7% higher G3D Mark score and 200% more VRAM (12 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon PRO W6400.

InsightRadeon PRO W6400GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-274.7%)
Leading raw performance (+274.7%)
Longevity
RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (6nm)
🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 4nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support
VRAM
🎮 High Capacity (4 GB)
🎮 High Capacity (12 GB)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
Standard Size (285mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $590 (vs $200), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 27% better value per dollar than the Radeon PRO W6400.

InsightRadeon PRO W6400GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+27%)
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($200)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($590)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO W6400 and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

AMD

Radeon PRO W6400

The Radeon PRO W6400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 19 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2331 MHz to 2331 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,428 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon PRO W6400 scores 8,428 versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 31,578 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 274.7%. The Radeon PRO W6400 is built on RDNA 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 6 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 768 (Radeon PRO W6400) vs 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Raw compute: 3.58 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6400) vs 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Boost clocks: 2331 MHz vs 2610 MHz. Ray tracing: 12 RT cores (Radeon PRO W6400) vs 60 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 240.

FeatureRadeon PRO W6400GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
G3D Mark Score
8,428
31,578+275%
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
Ada Lovelace
Process Node
6 nm
4 nm
Shading Units
768
7680+900%
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.58 TFLOPS
40.09 TFLOPS+1020%
Boost Clock
2331 MHz
2610 MHz+12%
ROPs
32
80+150%
TMUs
48
240+400%
L1 Cache
0.25 MB
7.5 MB+2900%
L2 Cache
1 MB
48 MB+4700%
Ray Tracing Cores
12
60+400%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon PRO W6400 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.

FeatureRadeon PRO W6400GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
DLSS 3.5
Frame Generation
Not Supported
DLSS 3.0 (Native)
Ray Reconstruction
No
Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon PRO W6400 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon PRO W6400) vs 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon PRO W6400GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
12 GB+200%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6X
Bus Width
256-bit+33%
192-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
48 MB+4700%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6400) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.

FeatureRadeon PRO W6400GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
DirectX
12.2+2%
12 Ultimate
Vulkan
1.2
1.3+8%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
2
4+100%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6400) vs NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Radeon PRO W6400) vs AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti).

FeatureRadeon PRO W6400GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Encoder
VCN 3.0
NVENC (8th Gen)
Decoder
VCN 3.0
NVDEC (5th Gen)
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)
AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon PRO W6400 draws 50W versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 285W — a 140.3% difference. The Radeon PRO W6400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon PRO W6400) vs 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 168mm vs 285mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 70°C.

FeatureRadeon PRO W6400GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
TDP
50W-82%
285W
Recommended PSU
500W-29%
700W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
8-pin
Length
168mm
285mm
Height
69mm
112mm
Slots
1-50%
2
Temp (Load)
70°C
70°C
Perf/Watt
168.6+52%
110.8
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon PRO W6400 launched at $229 MSRP and currently averages $200, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799 and now averages $590. The Radeon PRO W6400 costs 66.1% less ($390 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 42.1 (Radeon PRO W6400) vs 53.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 27.1% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).

FeatureRadeon PRO W6400GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
MSRP
$229-71%
$799
Avg Price (30d)
$200-66%
$590
Performance per Dollar
42.1
53.5+27%
Codename
Navi 24
AD104
Release
January 19 2022
January 3 2023
Ranking
#308
#11