
Radeon PRO W6400 vs CMP 40HX

Radeon PRO W6400
Popular choices:

CMP 40HX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon PRO W6400 is positioned at rank 33 and the CMP 40HX is on rank 119, so the Radeon PRO W6400 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO W6400
Performance Per Dollar CMP 40HX
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The CMP 40HX is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon PRO W6400.
| Insight | Radeon PRO W6400 | CMP 40HX |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.8%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (6nm) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (4 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (4 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The CMP 40HX offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $120 versus $200 for the Radeon PRO W6400, it costs 40% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 73% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon PRO W6400 | CMP 40HX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+73%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($200) | ✅More affordable ($120) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO W6400 and CMP 40HX

Radeon PRO W6400
The Radeon PRO W6400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 19 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2331 MHz to 2331 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,428 points.

CMP 40HX
The CMP 40HX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 25 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1470 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 185W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,749 points. Launch price was $699.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon PRO W6400 scores 8,428 and the CMP 40HX reaches 8,749 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W6400 is built on RDNA 2.0 while the CMP 40HX uses Turing, both on 6 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 768 (Radeon PRO W6400) vs 2,304 (CMP 40HX). Raw compute: 3.58 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6400) vs 7.603 TFLOPS (CMP 40HX). Boost clocks: 2331 MHz vs 1650 MHz. Ray tracing: 12 RT cores (Radeon PRO W6400) vs 36 (CMP 40HX) vs 288.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6400 | CMP 40HX |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,428 | 8,749+4% |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 2304+200% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.58 TFLOPS | 7.603 TFLOPS+112% |
| Boost Clock | 2331 MHz+41% | 1650 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 48 | 144+200% |
| L1 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2.3 MB+820% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 4 MB+300% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 12 | 36+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6400 | CMP 40HX |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon PRO W6400) vs 4 MB (CMP 40HX) — the CMP 40HX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6400 | CMP 40HX |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 4 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6400) vs 12 Ultimate (CMP 40HX). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6400 | CMP 40HX |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6400) vs No (CMP 40HX). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs No.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6400 | CMP 40HX |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 3.0 | No |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 | No |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO W6400 draws 50W versus the CMP 40HX's 185W — a 114.9% difference. The Radeon PRO W6400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon PRO W6400) vs 500W (CMP 40HX). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 229mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6400 | CMP 40HX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-73% | 185W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | 229mm |
| Height | 69mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-13% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 168.6+256% | 47.3 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon PRO W6400 launched at $229 MSRP and currently averages $200, while the CMP 40HX launched at $699 and now averages $120. The CMP 40HX costs 40% less ($80 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 42.1 (Radeon PRO W6400) vs 72.9 (CMP 40HX) — the CMP 40HX offers 73.2% better value. The Radeon PRO W6400 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2021).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6400 | CMP 40HX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $229-67% | $699 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $200 | $120-40% |
| Performance per Dollar | 42.1 | 72.9+73% |
| Codename | Navi 24 | TU106 |
| Release | January 19 2022 | February 25 2021 |
| Ranking | #308 | #302 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











