
Radeon Pro WX 7130 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

Radeon Pro WX 7130
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon Pro WX 7130 is positioned at rank #183 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 7130
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro WX 7130 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti.
| Insight | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti holds the technical lead. Priced at $65 (vs $200), it costs 68% less, resulting in a 205% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+205%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($200) | ✅More affordable ($65) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro WX 7130 and GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

Radeon Pro WX 7130
The Radeon Pro WX 7130 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1188 MHz to 1243 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,406 points. Launch price was $799.

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 25 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1291 MHz to 1392 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,350 points. Launch price was $139.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro WX 7130 scores 6,406 and the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti reaches 6,350 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro WX 7130 is built on GCN 4.0 while the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti uses Pascal, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti). Raw compute: 5.728 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs 2.138 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti). Boost clocks: 1243 MHz vs 1392 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,406 | 6,350 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+200% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.728 TFLOPS+168% | 2.138 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1243 MHz | 1392 MHz+12% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 144+200% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 576 KB+100% | 288 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro WX 7130 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti has 4 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 7130 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) — the Radeon Pro WX 7130 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs 12_1 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12_1 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs NVENC 6th Gen (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs NVDEC 3rd Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs H.264,H.265 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.4 | NVENC 6th Gen |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | NVDEC 3rd Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC | H.264,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro WX 7130 draws 130W versus the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti's 70W — a 60% difference. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W | 70W-46% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | — | 211mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 49.3 | 90.7+84% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro WX 7130 launched at $1000 MSRP and currently averages $200, while the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti launched at $140 and now averages $65. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti costs 67.5% less ($135 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 32.0 (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs 97.7 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) — the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti offers 205.3% better value.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1000 | $140-86% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $200 | $65-68% |
| Performance per Dollar | 32.0 | 97.7+205% |
| Codename | Ellesmere | GP107 |
| Release | November 10 2016 | October 25 2016 |
| Ranking | #331 | #381 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















