Radeon Pro WX 7130 vs Quadro P3000
Radeon Pro WX 7130
Popular choices:
Quadro P3000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon Pro WX 7130 is positioned at rank 183 and the Quadro P3000 is on rank 135, so the Quadro P3000 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 7130
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P3000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro WX 7130 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score and 33.3% more VRAM (8 GB vs 6 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro P3000.
| Insight | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | Quadro P3000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+33.3%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro P3000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro P3000 holds the technical lead. Priced at $80 (vs $200), it costs 60% less, resulting in a 149.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | Quadro P3000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+149.1%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($200) | ✅More affordable ($80) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro WX 7130 and Quadro P3000
Radeon Pro WX 7130
The Radeon Pro WX 7130 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1188 MHz to 1243 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,406 points. Launch price was $799.
Quadro P3000
The Quadro P3000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,384 points. Launch price was $5,999.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro WX 7130 scores 6,406 and the Quadro P3000 reaches 6,384 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro WX 7130 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Quadro P3000 uses Pascal, both on 14 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs 3,840 (Quadro P3000). Raw compute: 5.728 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs 12.63 TFLOPS (Quadro P3000). Boost clocks: 1243 MHz vs 1645 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | Quadro P3000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,406 | 6,384 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 3840+67% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.728 TFLOPS | 12.63 TFLOPS+120% |
| Boost Clock | 1243 MHz | 1645 MHz+32% |
| ROPs | 32 | 96+200% |
| TMUs | 144 | 240+67% |
| L1 Cache | 0.56 MB | 1.4 MB+150% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | Quadro P3000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro WX 7130 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P3000 has 6 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 7130 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs 3 MB (Quadro P3000) — the Quadro P3000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | Quadro P3000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+33% | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro P3000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | Quadro P3000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs 6th Gen NVENC (Pascal) (Quadro P3000). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs 3rd Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P3000).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | Quadro P3000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.4 | 6th Gen NVENC (Pascal) |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | 3rd Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC | H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro WX 7130 draws 130W versus the Quadro P3000's 250W — a 63.2% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 7130 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs 350W (Quadro P3000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | Quadro P3000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W-48% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 49.3+93% | 25.5 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro WX 7130 launched at $1000 MSRP and currently averages $200, while the Quadro P3000 launched at $600 and now averages $80. The Quadro P3000 costs 60% less ($120 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 32.0 (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs 79.8 (Quadro P3000) — the Quadro P3000 offers 149.4% better value.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | Quadro P3000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1000 | $600-40% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $200 | $80-60% |
| Performance per Dollar | 32.0 | 79.8+149% |
| Codename | Ellesmere | GP102 |
| Release | November 10 2016 | October 1 2016 |
| Ranking | #331 | #141 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Pro WX 7130 and Quadro P3000
